You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_suspsy

All Yesterdays---A Very Intriguing Book

Started by suspsy, December 13, 2012, 02:35:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

John

Quote from: tyrantqueen on January 04, 2013, 12:55:10 AM
QuoteIt seems that the main purpose of this book is more of a critique of what the authors percieve to be a lack of imagination on the part of other artists than anything related to science.On a personal note,I hope that all other artists don't start aping this style,as I think some of it,like the cotton ball looking Leallynasaura looks really stupid...
I agree, I thought that Leallynasaurua painting was terrible. It didn't look believeable at all to me, just a puffy blob. I like most of John Conway's work though.
Thank you! I couldn't agree more!
Don't you hate it when you legitimately compliment someone's mustache and she gets angry with you?


Patrx

#41
Yeah, it's not my favorite Leallynasaura, either XD I really like Niroot's version, or the one by Julio Lacerda. I can see what Conway was going for, though - dinosaurs in cold areas often have to fluff up quite a bit to keep warm:



This little guy is practically spherical XD

Gryphoceratops

#42
I see what patrx is saying.  They look silly but then again, lots of modern animals look silly to us as well.  Would anyone be able to guess the nose on a proboscis monkey having only seen the bones for instance or waddles on a turkey?  Don't get me wrong I am in no way saying that a puffy Leallynasaurua is considered most scientifically accurate by any means.  The image is thought provoking though. 

Brontozaurus

Conway's Leallynasaura is the most adorable thing ever and I love it.
"Uww wuhuhuhuh HAH HAWR HA HAWR."
-Ian Malcolm

My collection! UPDATED 21.03.2020: Dungeons & Dinosaurs!

Gwangi

I haven't read the book yet but it certainly seems thought provoking. We really don't know what these animals looked like and anything goes so I get the point behind it. That said I think most paleoart should stay a bit more conservative and focus on what we do know about the animals. That is not to say artists shouldn't experiment but there comes a point when you risk venturing from the scientific into the fantastic.

Sharptooth

Quote from: mmfrankford on January 02, 2013, 12:01:51 PM
Sad thing is Peters is not a bad illustrator, he just took a hard right turn somewhere?  ???

He simply has a different (and more than probably wrong) opinion about pterosaurs, that's all.

Not the first time scientists bicker like this  ::)


"I am the eyes in the night, the silence within the wind. I am the talons through the fire."

mmfrankford

Quote from: Sharptooth on January 08, 2013, 04:37:53 PM
Quote from: mmfrankford on January 02, 2013, 12:01:51 PM
Sad thing is Peters is not a bad illustrator, he just took a hard right turn somewhere?  ???

He simply has a different (and more than probably wrong) opinion about pterosaurs, that's all.

Not the first time scientists bicker like this  ::)

I totally agree. Though some of his pterosaur illustrations are bizarre?  :o :))

Amazon ad:

Balaur

Just got the book for my iPad last night. It was fantastic! I m going to change my way of drawing dinosaurs. And I just have.. Amazing book, recommend it fully! Love Conways art!

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.