You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_Balaur

The Mystery of the Plesiosaurs

Started by Balaur, October 11, 2012, 04:07:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Balaur

Okay, sensationalistic title, but, I am curious. Somethings has been bugging me. Several things. First, are nothosaurs related to plesiosaurs? And when did the first plesiosaur appear? Second, what about the diamond shaped tails on plesiosaurs and pliosaurs, which ones would have them, which ones wouldn't? Third, I have heard Predator X was the largest pliosaur. Then I found that there was a pliosaur from the Jurassic of Dorset, that was bigger than Predator X. What was it?

I know we have a plesiosaur expert here. I just need clarification of these subjects. It is very intresting and can help me for my future reconstructions of the best marine reptiles that ever lived.

Thanks for any comments!  :)


amargasaurus cazaui

Oh good premise for a thread. I have little knowledge or information about those animals myself and would enjoy seeing where the thread goes, thanks for posting it .
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


Balaur

Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on October 11, 2012, 05:31:11 AM
Oh good premise for a thread. I have little knowledge or information about those animals myself and would enjoy seeing where the thread goes, thanks for posting it .

No problem!  :)

wings

Quote from: balaurbondoc2843 on October 11, 2012, 04:07:29 AM...First, are nothosaurs related to plesiosaurs? And when did the first plesiosaur appear?...
This should be a good place to start (http://dml.cmnh.org/1997Jun/msg00263.html).

wings

Quote from: balaurbondoc2843 on October 11, 2012, 04:07:29 AM
...Second, what about the diamond shaped tails on plesiosaurs and pliosaurs, which ones would have them, which ones wouldn't?...
For this question, if you would like an intro then go to this link (http://saurian.blogspot.com.au/2011/01/tail-fins-for-plesiosaurs.html) and the actual paper on here (http://www.marshall.edu/etd/masters/wilhelm-benjamin-2010-ms.pdf). Just start reading the paper from page 41 onward, I skimmed through it a little and I think one of the element to look for from this paper is the change of direction of the neural spines on the tail vertebrae as an indication of the start of the "tail fin" (I'm sure there is more to it but I think it's better for you to read it... :) ). This is not the first paper on the subject but I suppose the very first paper by Dame is quite hard to obtain...

On a side note, here is a paper on mosasaurs' tail fins (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0011998) and a paper on possible integuments on these animals (http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027343).

A rather good website to go to would be the "Oceans of Kansas" (http://www.oceansofkansas.com/).

amargasaurus cazaui

The "Oceans of kansas" web site is an excellent place to study these animals. It is maintained and authored by Michael Everhart, who I was fortunate enough to meet and have sign my copy of his book. He is a very knowledgeable man on the topic and quite well versed . I did make note he was also one of the consultants for the Carnegie Tylosaurus figure, so i had him sign one of those as well for me. One of the few meager benefits of actually living in Kansas
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


tyrantqueen

#6
Sorry if this is the incorrect place to post this, but since we're on the topic of plesiosaurs and the like- where is a good place to find skeletal restorations? I've been searching everywhere but there is barely anything to be found. I am particularly interested in mosasaurs.

The only thing I could find that was near enough to what I wanted was this skeletal by Dr. Smith


That's only one species though... :(

Amazon ad:

Gryphoceratops

Just wait for Dr. Admin to see.  He probably can answer all of those questions for you!

Balaur

Quote from: tyrantqueen on October 11, 2012, 05:38:26 PM
Sorry if this is the incorrect place to post this, but since we're on the topic of plesiosaurs and the like- where is a good place to find skeletal restorations? I've been searching everywhere but there is barely anything to be found. I am particularly interested in mosasaurs.

The only thing I could find that was near enough to what I wanted was this skeletal by Dr. Smith


That's only one species though... :(

Nope. This the the right place to post. Anything plesiosaur related!  :)

Just got back from school, so I am continuing to read the paper on the caudal fins, thanks Wings! :)

DinoToyForum

I can, but not right now. I'm on a research trip to Dorchester to study this guy  8) : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14061347

There are a few more skeletal reconstructions on my website here, though I need to add more...: http://www.plesiosauria.com/line_drawings.php



Balaur

Quote from: dinotoyforum on October 12, 2012, 12:16:04 AM
I can, but not right now. I'm on a research trip to Dorchester to study this guy  8) : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14061347

There are a few more skeletal reconstructions on my website here, though I need to add more...: http://www.plesiosauria.com/line_drawings.php

AWESOME! I can't wait to find out more about him. Probably the most bada** that ever ruled the oceans!  ;)

DinoToyForum

Sorry for the delay.

Yes, nothosaurs are closely related to plesiosaurs, they both belong to the same group, Sauropterygia. However, plesiosaurs are not direct descendants of nothosaurs, they just share a very close common ancestor. The first plesiosaurs occur in the late Triassic and the oldest diagnostic plesiosaur genera and species are from the Triassic-Jurassic boundary.

The presence of a tail fin in plesiosaurs is still a contentious topic. Several researchers are working in this topic, including myself.

The Weymouth Bay pliosaur from Dorset is known from a complete skull and is probably a species of Pliosaurus (based on current diagnoses for that genus).

Hope this helps!



Balaur

Quote from: dinotoyforum on October 20, 2012, 01:08:18 PM
Sorry for the delay.

Yes, nothosaurs are closely related to plesiosaurs, they both belong to the same group, Sauropterygia. However, plesiosaurs are not direct descendants of nothosaurs, they just share a very close common ancestor. The first plesiosaurs occur in the late Triassic and the oldest diagnostic plesiosaur genera and species are from the Triassic-Jurassic boundary.

The presence of a tail fin in plesiosaurs is still a contentious topic. Several researchers are working in this topic, including myself.

The Weymouth Bay pliosaur from Dorset is known from a complete skull and is probably a species of Pliosaurus (based on current diagnoses for that genus).

Hope this helps!

Thank you so much! Don't worry about the delay, It was worth it.  ;) I guess I should keep open as an official "Anything Plesiosaur" thread. Thanks Dr. Admin!  :)


Balaur

I am here to revive this topic. So, I have another question on Plesiosaurs. Could Cryptoclidus actually lay on land and bask and sleep on the shore or would it suffocate and have spent its entire life in the water?

FUTABA

(Just butting my way in). I think Cryptoclidus would most likely be fully aquatic. Considering it's hefty weight and inflexible torso aswell as, if, theoretically, it were to crawl about on the land, it's inflexible horizontal neck would mean it'd be dragging it's face along the ground all the time. Evidence for viviparous birth (live birth) has also been found in the genus Polycotylus, so it's pretty safe to assume most if not all Plesiosaurs gave birth to live young (as did the Icthyosaurs) so there wouldn't be any need to leave the water to lay eggs or anything.

As for sleep, I'd say the most likely thing would be that Plesiosaurs and Ichthyosaurs alike slept much in the same way Dolphins and Whales do. They let one half of their brain at a time relax into a deep sleep, while the other half remains alert, and alternate sides so they can still decide when to surface for breath. (Breathing is a conscious decision for these sorts of animals, unlike us, where it is involuntary of course). Therefore they never become fully unconscious but still get the rest they require. It's likely that if Plesiosaurs, Ichthyosaurs etc adopted this method of sleep then they would have one eye open at all times when sleeping, as this occurs with modern Cetaceans. Or of course I may be embarrassingly wrong. :-X
I really really like blue things.

Horridus

The evidence for live birth shows that plesiosaurs were fully marine. The old idea of them hauling themselves on to the shore was based on the assumption that they must have laid eggs on land, a la sea turtles.
All you need is love...in the time of chasmosaurs http://chasmosaurs.blogspot.com/
@Mhorridus

Balaur

Just to clarify. I know that plesiosaurs gave birth to live young, but was wondering whether or not it was physically possible for it to be on land. I think I have my answer thouh. I appreciate your guys's help.

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.