You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_sauroid

Fossil dog: New species roamed eastern North America 12 million years ago

Started by sauroid, May 12, 2016, 04:00:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

sauroid

May 12, 2016, 04:00:47 PM
"you know you have a lot of prehistoric figures if you have at least twenty items per page of the prehistoric/dinosaur section on ebay." - anon.

E.D.G.E. (PainterRex)

#1
May 12, 2016, 05:54:03 PM
There again with nonsensical journalistic hyperbole, what does the fact that it lived with Megalodon have to do with it? I understand giving a time relation, but I am sure it lived with plenty of other things, that it actually met!
Hello! We are the Expeditioner's Discovery Guild Enterprise (E.D.G.E.). Subscribe to us on YouTube to get interesting content about Earth's past, present, and future!

✅Email: [email protected]

✅Facebook: facebook.com/ExpeditionDG/

✅Discord: https://discord.gg/RDW4mAk

✅Twitter: twitter.com/EDGEinthewild

✅Instagram: @edgeonthetrail

Tyto_Theropod

#2
May 13, 2016, 04:14:11 PM Last Edit: May 13, 2016, 04:14:27 PM by Tyto_Theropod
Quote from: PainterRex on May 12, 2016, 05:54:03 PM
There again with nonsensical journalistic hyperbole, what does the fact that it lived with Megalodon have to do with it? I understand giving a time relation, but I am sure it lived with plenty of other things, that it actually met!

I know, right? It seems that every animal that lived anywhere in the world during the Maastrichtian has to be labelled as LIVING AT THE SAME TIME THAT T. REX RULED THE LAND! STOP PRESS! OMGWTFBBQ! AWESOMEBRO!!!  :))
UPDATE - Where've I been, my other hobbies, and how to navigate my Flickr:
http://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9277.msg280559#msg280559
______________________________________________________________________________________
Flickr for crafts and models: https://www.flickr.com/photos/162561992@N05/
Flickr for wildlife photos: Link to be added
Twitter: @MaudScientist

stargatedalek

#3
May 13, 2016, 08:58:03 PM
"Hyena like canine".

Nope done reading.

Gwangi

#4
May 13, 2016, 10:51:41 PM
Quote from: stargatedalek on May 13, 2016, 08:58:03 PM
"Hyena like canine".

Nope done reading.

It says "in this respect they are believed to have behaved in a similar way to hyenas today".

Borophagins are commonly compared to hyenas. What's the problem?

Yutyrannus

#5
May 14, 2016, 12:45:04 AM
Quote from: Gwangi on May 13, 2016, 10:51:41 PM
Quote from: stargatedalek on May 13, 2016, 08:58:03 PM
"Hyena like canine".

Nope done reading.

It says "in this respect they are believed to have behaved in a similar way to hyenas today".

Borophagins are commonly compared to hyenas. What's the problem?
The problem is that it says "canine," which is the group that includes all modern dogs, it needs to say either "canid" or "borophagine."

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Gwangi

#6
May 14, 2016, 02:29:49 AM Last Edit: May 14, 2016, 02:31:50 AM by Gwangi
Quote from: Yutyrannus on May 14, 2016, 12:45:04 AM
Quote from: Gwangi on May 13, 2016, 10:51:41 PM
Quote from: stargatedalek on May 13, 2016, 08:58:03 PM
"Hyena like canine".

Nope done reading.

It says "in this respect they are believed to have behaved in a similar way to hyenas today".

Borophagins are commonly compared to hyenas. What's the problem?
The problem is that it says "canine," which is the group that includes all modern dogs, it needs to say either "canid" or "borophagine."

The family is Canidae, which contains the subfamily of the same name as well as the subfamily Borophaginae. Any member of the family can be called a canid or canine.

Amazon ad:

Yutyrannus

#7
May 14, 2016, 03:56:05 AM
Quote from: Gwangi on May 14, 2016, 02:29:49 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on May 14, 2016, 12:45:04 AM
The problem is that it says "canine," which is the group that includes all modern dogs, it needs to say either "canid" or "borophagine."

The family is Canidae, which contains the subfamily of the same name as well as the subfamily Borophaginae. Any member of the family can be called a canid or canine.
Any member of the family can be called a canid, yes, but "canine" refers specifically to members of the subfamily Caninae. As Cynarctus is a member of the Borophaginae, it cannot be called a canine.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Gwangi

#8
May 14, 2016, 05:24:20 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on May 14, 2016, 03:56:05 AM
Quote from: Gwangi on May 14, 2016, 02:29:49 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on May 14, 2016, 12:45:04 AM
The problem is that it says "canine," which is the group that includes all modern dogs, it needs to say either "canid" or "borophagine."

The family is Canidae, which contains the subfamily of the same name as well as the subfamily Borophaginae. Any member of the family can be called a canid or canine.
Any member of the family can be called a canid, yes, but "canine" refers specifically to members of the subfamily Caninae. As Cynarctus is a member of the Borophaginae, it cannot be called a canine.

Fair enough, that seems to check out.

stargatedalek

#9
May 14, 2016, 04:15:58 PM
Quote from: Gwangi on May 13, 2016, 10:51:41 PM
Quote from: stargatedalek on May 13, 2016, 08:58:03 PM
"Hyena like canine".

Nope done reading.

It says "in this respect they are believed to have behaved in a similar way to hyenas today".

Borophagins are commonly compared to hyenas. What's the problem?
That makes sense. I figured it was saying they were related. I've heard to many people call hyenas canines not to jump to the worst possible explanation.

Gwangi

#10
May 15, 2016, 02:40:03 AM
Quote from: stargatedalek on May 14, 2016, 04:15:58 PM
Quote from: Gwangi on May 13, 2016, 10:51:41 PM
Quote from: stargatedalek on May 13, 2016, 08:58:03 PM
"Hyena like canine".

Nope done reading.

It says "in this respect they are believed to have behaved in a similar way to hyenas today".

Borophagins are commonly compared to hyenas. What's the problem?
That makes sense. I figured it was saying they were related. I've heard to many people call hyenas canines not to jump to the worst possible explanation.

Gotcha. Yeah, it annoys me too when hyenas are classified as canines. The BBC series "Life of Mammals" makes that mistake and it bugs me every time.

Yutyrannus

#11
May 15, 2016, 03:23:22 AM
Quote from: Gwangi on May 15, 2016, 02:40:03 AM
Quote from: stargatedalek on May 14, 2016, 04:15:58 PM
That makes sense. I figured it was saying they were related. I've heard to many people call hyenas canines not to jump to the worst possible explanation.
Gotcha. Yeah, it annoys me too when hyenas are classified as canines. The BBC series "Life of Mammals" makes that mistake and it bugs me every time.
Yeah, that's still one of my favourite documentaries but that drives me nuts every time I watch it.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions