You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_DinoToyForum

Jurassic Park 4 [Jurassic World] (no spoilers)

Started by DinoToyForum, June 21, 2012, 11:20:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Gwangi

The Mosasaurus will probably look similar to the one in the recent Jurassic Park game by Telltell Games.



Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Gwangi on August 04, 2014, 07:21:47 PM
The Mosasaurus will probably look similar to the one in the recent Jurassic Park game by Telltell Games.



I hope that's just a paint smudge between the rear flippers!
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Gwangi


Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Gwangi on August 04, 2014, 07:30:08 PM
That smudge is the rear flipper.

Phew, I thought it was an egg case.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

stargatedalek

Quote"I have read them, but they only get a small percent of DNA, the mosasaur will probably have some, um, genetic oddities."
I'm pretty sure crocodile scutes qualify as a genetic oddity on a mosasaur
and its not like the other dinosaurs were genetically whole either

Trisdino

So basically, they are going to follow the trend of explaining away the inaccurate animals by saying their DNA is mixed with something that makes no sense?


Non-avian dinosaurs:
Should be mixed with - birds
Were mixed with - frogs

Mosasaurs:
Should be mixed with - monitor lizards
Were mixed with - crocodiles

Pterosaurs:
Should be mixed with - birds
Were mixed with - Cthulhu

amargasaurus cazaui

Pterosaurs mixed with birds, that is an interesting idea .
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


Amazon ad:

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: stargatedalek on August 05, 2014, 04:25:39 AM
Quote"I have read them, but they only get a small percent of DNA, the mosasaur will probably have some, um, genetic oddities."
I'm pretty sure crocodile scutes qualify as a genetic oddity on a mosasaur
and its not like the other dinosaurs were genetically whole either

I know, that's what I was saying.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Blade-of-the-Moon

The inclusion of frog dna was a plot point..it doesn't say that was all they used either.

The Ptreranodons in the third film were scaly and had teeth. Some pterosaurs had teeth. They saw those were wrong and didn't put them in the park. Just used the ones from the end of the Lost World.

Trisdino

Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on August 05, 2014, 08:31:46 AM
Pterosaurs mixed with birds, that is an interesting idea .

Birds are the closet living relatives of pterosaurs.



As for the whole jp3 pteranodon thingy... the movie never explained why they looked like that, it was probably just a flub on the movie makers part, considering the rest of the film, that would not be odd.

Blade-of-the-Moon

Quote from: Trisdino on August 05, 2014, 06:32:47 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on August 05, 2014, 08:31:46 AM
Pterosaurs mixed with birds, that is an interesting idea .

Birds are the closet living relatives of pterosaurs.



As for the whole jp3 pteranodon thingy... the movie never explained why they looked like that, it was probably just a flub on the movie makers part, considering the rest of the film, that would not be odd.

Yeah they cut too much really..Grant's remark " makes me wonder else they were working on.. " was the only real key.   They were supposed to attack the boat at the opening to JP3 as well.

They were just mutants in the end, a step toward the more realistic creature they were trying for, but Hammond couldn't stand to have them destroyed you know?

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Trisdino on August 05, 2014, 06:32:47 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on August 05, 2014, 08:31:46 AM
Pterosaurs mixed with birds, that is an interesting idea .

Birds are the closet living relatives of pterosaurs.



As for the whole jp3 pteranodon thingy... the movie never explained why they looked like that, it was probably just a flub on the movie makers part, considering the rest of the film, that would not be odd.

Birds and pterosaurs aren't  closely related.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

tyrantqueen

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 05, 2014, 07:34:10 PM
Quote from: Trisdino on August 05, 2014, 06:32:47 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on August 05, 2014, 08:31:46 AM
Pterosaurs mixed with birds, that is an interesting idea .

Birds are the closet living relatives of pterosaurs.



As for the whole jp3 pteranodon thingy... the movie never explained why they looked like that, it was probably just a flub on the movie makers part, considering the rest of the film, that would not be odd.

Birds and pterosaurs aren't  closely related.
Actually they are..unless you're David Peters. Both are archosaurs.


Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: tyrantqueen on August 05, 2014, 07:38:52 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 05, 2014, 07:34:10 PM
Quote from: Trisdino on August 05, 2014, 06:32:47 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on August 05, 2014, 08:31:46 AM
Pterosaurs mixed with birds, that is an interesting idea .

Birds are the closet living relatives of pterosaurs.



As for the whole jp3 pteranodon thingy... the movie never explained why they looked like that, it was probably just a flub on the movie makers part, considering the rest of the film, that would not be odd.

Birds and pterosaurs aren't  closely related.
Actually they are..unless you're David Peters. Both are archosaurs.

So far that I know, I'm not.

Yes, but still distantly related. You could say alligators are pterosaurs closest relatives, their even closer than birds.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Gwangi

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 05, 2014, 07:41:22 PM
Quote from: tyrantqueen on August 05, 2014, 07:38:52 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 05, 2014, 07:34:10 PM
Quote from: Trisdino on August 05, 2014, 06:32:47 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on August 05, 2014, 08:31:46 AM
Pterosaurs mixed with birds, that is an interesting idea .

Birds are the closet living relatives of pterosaurs.



As for the whole jp3 pteranodon thingy... the movie never explained why they looked like that, it was probably just a flub on the movie makers part, considering the rest of the film, that would not be odd.

Birds and pterosaurs aren't  closely related.
Actually they are..unless you're David Peters. Both are archosaurs.

So far that I know, I'm not.

Yes, but still distantly related. You could say alligators are pterosaurs closest relatives, their even closer than birds.

Not true. While pterosaurs are not dinosaurs they do belong to a group that includes them but excludes crocodilians. This group is called Ornithodira and literally is defined as "all animals, living or extinct, which are more closely related to birds than to crocodiles." Therefore, the closest living relatives of the pterosaurs are birds.

tyrantqueen

QuoteNot true. While pterosaurs are not dinosaurs they do belong to a group that includes them but excludes crocodilians. This group is called Ornithodira and literally is defined as "all animals, living or extinct, which are more closely related to birds than to crocodiles." Therefore, the closest living relatives of the pterosaurs are birds.


HD-man

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 05, 2014, 07:41:22 PMYou could say alligators are pterosaurs closest relatives, their even closer than birds.

Actually, as indicated by the following cladogram, they're not.

I'm also known as JD-man at deviantART: http://jd-man.deviantart.com/

HD-man

Quote from: Gwangi on August 05, 2014, 08:05:21 PMNot true. While pterosaurs are not dinosaurs they do belong to a group that includes them but excludes crocodilians. This group is called Ornithodira and literally is defined as "all animals, living or extinct, which are more closely related to birds than to crocodiles." Therefore, the closest living relatives of the pterosaurs are birds.

Argh, how dare you correct someone b-4 I do (Just kidding)!
I'm also known as JD-man at deviantART: http://jd-man.deviantart.com/

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: HD-man on August 05, 2014, 08:14:36 PM
Quote from: Gwangi on August 05, 2014, 08:05:21 PMNot true. While pterosaurs are not dinosaurs they do belong to a group that includes them but excludes crocodilians. This group is called Ornithodira and literally is defined as "all animals, living or extinct, which are more closely related to birds than to crocodiles." Therefore, the closest living relatives of the pterosaurs are birds.

Argh, how dare you correct someone b-4 I do (Just kidding)!

Ok ok! One correction was enough!

Why do birds get to be used in the definition? Why not: all animals more closely related to dinosaurs, than to crocodiles?
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Trisdino

Actually UltimatedinoKing, according to wikipedia, that is the definition.

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: