News:

Poll time! Cast your votes for the best stegosaur toys, the best ceratopsoid toys (excluding Triceratops), and the best allosauroid toys (excluding Allosaurus) of all time! Some of the polls have been reset to include some recent releases, so please vote again, even if you voted previously.

Main Menu

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_amargasaurus cazaui

Feathers, quills and mesozoic thrills

Started by amargasaurus cazaui, October 17, 2012, 05:12:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ZoPteryx

While flipping through that new dinosaur art book (a must buy! :o),  I noticed that certain artists give their dinos scutes on their feet like most birds and others do not.  What evidence is their either way, especially among dinos far from birds?


wings

Quote from: Zopteryx on November 24, 2012, 03:50:18 AM
While flipping through that new dinosaur art book (a must buy! :o),  I noticed that certain artists give their dinos scutes on their feet like most birds and others do not.  What evidence is their either way, especially among dinos far from birds?
The simple answer is none. We do occasionally get scale patterns on the sole of the feet from their footprints or skin impression surrounding their feet but none of them actually reported to have clear defined "scutes".

Gryphoceratops

#22
From what I heard the triceratops specimen that preserved some skin (the same specimen with those little "nipple" shaped scales on its back that you see all over recent ceratopsid paleo art) had some rectangular scales on its toes/fingers.  Not exactly like those on a bird's, but scales none the less.  To my knowledge a paper describing the specimen hasn't been published yet. 

John

Quote from: Gryphoceratops on November 25, 2012, 01:27:44 PM
From what I heard the triceratops specimen that preserved some skin (the same specimen with those little "nipple" shaped scales on its back that you see all over recent ceratopsid paleo art) had some rectangular scales on its toes/fingers.  Not exactly like those on a bird's, but scales none the less.  To my knowledge a paper describing the specimen hasn't been published yet.
Would you happen to know if the impressions show it to not have nails on it's fourth and fifth outer digits on it's hand like other archosaurs?
It would not surprise me in the least if it did match other archosaurs in this regard.
Don't you hate it when you legitimately compliment someone's mustache and she gets angry with you?

Gryphoceratops

#24
Quote from: John on November 26, 2012, 06:41:58 PM
Quote from: Gryphoceratops on November 25, 2012, 01:27:44 PM
From what I heard the triceratops specimen that preserved some skin (the same specimen with those little "nipple" shaped scales on its back that you see all over recent ceratopsid paleo art) had some rectangular scales on its toes/fingers.  Not exactly like those on a bird's, but scales none the less.  To my knowledge a paper describing the specimen hasn't been published yet.
Would you happen to know if the impressions show it to not have nails on it's fourth and fifth outer digits on it's hand like other archosaurs?
It would not surprise me in the least if it did match other archosaurs in this regard.

Hmm good question never thought to ask.  I will ask and report back here!

For the record btw, I was first given this information by a friend/mentor from my old college who is a paleontologist who got it from the Carnegie Museum of Natural History.  The specimen itself was collected by the Black Hills Institute. 

UPDATE: He said he doesn't think any nails preserved on the mummy.  If they did, they haven't released information about it yet. 

wings

#25
Quote from: John on November 26, 2012, 06:41:58 PM
Would you happen to know if the impressions show it to not have nails on it's fourth and fifth outer digits on it's hand like other archosaurs?
It would not surprise me in the least if it did match other archosaurs in this regard.
Not sure whether this is the norm for archosaurs since we don't really have much to compare with (Crocodilians and aves). Here is a paper on footprints which shows at least some thyreophorans had claws on digit 1 to 4 (http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aabc/v83n1/v83n1a15.pdf, Figure 4).

John

Quote from: wings on November 27, 2012, 04:45:56 AM
Quote from: John on November 26, 2012, 06:41:58 PM
Would you happen to know if the impressions show it to not have nails on it's fourth and fifth outer digits on it's hand like other archosaurs?
It would not surprise me in the least if it did match other archosaurs in this regard.
Not sure whether this is the norm for archosaurs since we don't really have much to compare with (Crocodilians and aves). Here is a paper on footprints which shows at least some thyreophorans had claws on digit 1 to 4 (http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aabc/v83n1/v83n1a15.pdf, Figure 4).
This is good to know,thanks!
Don't you hate it when you legitimately compliment someone's mustache and she gets angry with you?

wings

Apart from the above paper, there seems to be more examples however none of these are published (see http://dinosaurpalaeo.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/more-of-urzeit-park/, just go straight down to the comments).

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.