You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

Shelves for storing models in the form of a cladogram

Started by Miniorbis, August 12, 2025, 03:00:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Miniorbis

Hi, I'm sending a sample of how I handle saving models.

Dinosauria_018 (r).JPG
Dinosauria_010 (r).JPG


Libraraptor

#1
While the idea is great and it looks good,work must be done on the practicability. Definitely expandable ^-^

crazy8wizard

I like the idea but the models on the shelf not adhering to the periods laid out on the wall, in addition to not being arranged by how basal or derived they are in said cladogram which makes me wonder if this needed to be a cladogram in the first place.
It could very well work as a Mark Hallett "Families of Dinosaurs" type display though!

DinoToyForum

Yes, a lovely idea as a broad principle, your display looks great. It is tricky in practice to position everything exactly right, but I suppose it doesn't need to be exact.



Torvosaurus

#4
Quote from: Miniorbis on August 12, 2025, 03:00:34 PMHi, I'm sending a sample of how I handle saving models.

Dinosauria_018 (r).JPG
Dinosauria_010 (r).JPG

I like the idea, that looks very good. As far as the degree of separation on the table, you can make it as complicated or as simple as you want it. Whether you want the differences to be by family or right down to the divisions in a clade really depends on your tastes (and how much work you want to put into it). I must say that having the dinosaurs marked down to the exact position on a clade would be fairly complicated and probably take a good portion of the wall in general. For a general breakdown, I like how you have it.

Torvo
"In the fields of observation chance favors only the prepared mind." - Louis Pasteur

Protopatch

This is a great idea however, I can't imagine the walls of my apartment papered with phylogenetic trees :||

Stegotyranno420

Superb idea, but one question.

Why are Herrerasauria closer to Ornithschia than to either Sauropoda or Theropoda, the two groups they have been  stated to likely have been closest too? Is there a new theory im not aware of?

or is it just an issue of space and they all 4 equally diverge from the ancestral point? H just looks closer to O

Amazon ad:

Torvosaurus

Quote from: Protopatch on August 12, 2025, 08:36:14 PMThis is a great idea however, I can't imagine the walls of my apartment papered with phylogenetic trees :||


Yeah, I don't think the Mrs. would be too fond of that either. 😀

Torvo
"In the fields of observation chance favors only the prepared mind." - Louis Pasteur

Miniorbis

#8
Thanks for the responses, creating cladograms, especially of extinct creatures, is not very easy for me. There are more problems - new findings constantly refine and change cladograms. I have to take into account spatial possibilities, the range of models, etc. And I am also still learning, this board was one of the first. It is true that Herrerasaurs belong to the branch of Saurischia. At the time I was creating this shelf, there were discussions about whether Theropoda and Sauropodomorpha should be separated from a common clade.
And something for those who cannot imagine a wall of cladograms :-)
Kladograms.jpg

Libraraptor

Great work indeed! I wouldn't let small-scale discussions deter me from presenting the larger issues. You do this excellently, I think. I can easily imagine your work as teaching material.

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.