i saw one carneige collection for 2016 on wikipedia

[profnik]

I saw one carneige collection of kosmoceratops for 2016. so I thought all carneige collection was retired.

click here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_collection

[John]

I saw one carneige collection of kosmoceratops for 2016. so I thought all carneige collection was retired.

click here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_collection

The Carnegie Collection actually has been retired.That Wikipedia entry is not true.Anyone can edit and add things to any Wikipedia article.

[DinoToyForum]

I saw one carneige collection of kosmoceratops for 2016. so I thought all carneige collection was retired.

click here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_collection

The Carnegie Collection actually has been retired.That Wikipedia entry is not true.Anyone can edit and add things to any Wikipedia article.

The moral of the story, never trust Wikipedia unless there's a valid citation. 

[Roselaar]

Any chance we'll be seeing this species in the Wild Safari line instead next year, per chance?

[Pachyrhinosaurus]

I remember it got a few people's hopes up a few years ago when Wikipedia said we'd be getting an einiosaurus and deinonychus.

[SBell]

I remember it got a few people's hopes up a few years ago when Wikipedia said we'd be getting an einiosaurus and deinonychus.

For some reason, the Carnegie Wiki page has always been the worst hit for this--people just adding 'upcoming' dinosaurs for several years without any verification--and almost never correct. As Adam said, don't trust Wikipedia unless there is a source.

[PaleoMatt]

Now it says ceratosaurus and updated stegosaurus XD

[DinoToyForum]

Now it says ceratosaurus and updated stegosaurus XD

Removed already.

[CityRaptor]

I think they really need to have that page protected.

[PaleoMatt]

I removed it

[Shonisaurus]

Wikipedia gives often misinformation. I hear that the said contents in some cases can bring anyone through articles, which often are speculative.

It's no wonder they committed that error. It was only a hoax about the Kosmoceratops unfortunately.

[Stuckasaurus (Dino Dad Reviews)]

Yeah, we got a Ceratosaurus and new Stegosaurus only a few years ago, no way they'd be doing new ones already. Don't pay attention to the page.

[Takama]

Wikipedia gives often misinformation. I hear that the said contents in some cases can bring anyone through articles, which often are speculative.

It's no wonder they committed that error. It was only a hoax about the Kosmoceratops unfortunately.

A While ago(maybe last year, or the year before) Safari flat out said that they did not have any plans for a Kosmoceratops.    But that was quite a while ago. perhaps they are considering it now?