News:

Poll time! Cast your votes for the best stegosaur toys, the best ceratopsoid toys (excluding Triceratops), and the best allosauroid toys (excluding Allosaurus) of all time! Some of the polls have been reset to include some recent releases, so please vote again, even if you voted previously.

Main Menu

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_Sim

A Re-Evaluation of Chasmosaurus

Started by Sim, February 10, 2016, 03:32:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Sim

February 10, 2016, 03:32:48 PM
This interesting paper was published on 4 January 2016.  I haven't seen any posts about it on this forum though, so, here we go!

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0145805

It finds only two species of Chasmosaurus are valid, Chasmosaurus belli and Chasmosaurus russelli.  Mojoceratops is found to be a junior synonym of Chasmosaurus russelli (again).

Halichoeres

#1
February 10, 2016, 09:14:09 PM
Ah, good. Never much liked that name.
In the kingdom of the blind, better take public transit. Well, in the kingdom of the sighted, too, really--almost everyone is a terrible driver.

My attempt to find the best toy of every species

My trade/sale/wishlist thread

Sometimes I draw pictures

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions