You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

Of Uintatheres, Brontotheres, Rhinos, and Arsinoitherium

Started by Bokisaurus, February 01, 2014, 06:05:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: paleoferroequine on August 08, 2014, 06:33:28 PM
   Unfortunately, I doubt there is much work done on dinocerata and unitatheres that I know of. Most of Artiodactyla is kind of a mess and needs to be sorted out. At least in my layman's opinion. ;D

   Around the 1870 to 1880 time frame E.D. Cope and O.C. Marsh were at each others throat and naming new species willy nilly. They would often proclaim new ideas probably just to be contrary to their arch rival. Cope had it into his head that Eobasileus had a trunk and he proposed putting them in Proboscidea. Well, whatever:


   Too bad he was wrong, I kind of like the look of the guy in a Lovecraftian way! ::)

So, it's a trunked,  tusked, knobbed, and antlered beast? Sums up hoofed mammals!  :D
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK


SBell

Quote from: paleoferroequine on August 08, 2014, 04:58:20 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 08, 2014, 03:55:38 PM


Oh, I just assumed it was a baby because of its larger eyes, and... Wait? What! It's not a uintatherium?

   Eobasileus is a uintathere and is for all purposes identical to Uintatherium.  I'll quote Avancna at Deviant Art.

   "The Eocene uintatheres, Eobasileus cornutus and Uintatherium robustum, of what is now Western North America.
The differences between these two uintatheres are frustratingly few and far between... They're like Christina Aguilera and J.Lo... Can only be differentiated with extreme difficulty by a specialist."   

Using features like skulls differentiates them. Although it's difficult to argue with the peer-reviewed journal that is DeviantArt. Especially given the comparison between 2 individual humans that would be pretty easy to tell apart.

CityRaptor

Quote from: tyrantqueen on August 08, 2014, 07:14:13 AM
I don't understand the My Little Pony reference... :-X

Has to do with the whole mean thing. Since I like that Griffon Design I looked up pictures of her. Seems like Fans of that whiny yellow pony hate her for making it cry. That single roar is however the only thing she ever did to it.

Back on topic:
Quote from: SBell on August 06, 2014, 02:07:57 AM
And since it appears to be missing:


One of the versions anyway--there are two paint schemes.

That seems to be the more common version. When I got a set of 30 still sealed Dinotales a few years ago, I got 3 of that one, but none of the other color. 
Jurassic Park is frightning in the dark
All the dinosaurs are running wild
Someone let T. Rex out of his pen
I'm afraid those things'll harm me
'Cause they sure don't act like Barney
And they think that I'm their dinner, not their friend
Oh no

Bokisaurus

New addition s to the herd, from Geowolrd comes Embolotherium and Eobasileus figures
[]

Megalosaurus

Its nice to see real pictures of this Geoworlds. I actually want the Eobasileus.
Alt ought I dislike the read eyes and the pointy snout.
Sobreviviendo a la extinción!!!

suchomimus

Back on topic:
Quote from: SBell on August 06, 2014, 02:07:57 AM
And since it appears to be missing:


One of the versions anyway--there are two paint schemes.

Here's the other variant, and with the Kaiyodo Study Collection Skull mount. Tail's broken though ;-;


And accompanying fact sheet!

Stuckasaurus (Dino Dad Reviews)

What's the non-Collecta Paraceratherium (or whichever indricothere genus) in the original post? What scale is it?

Amazon ad:

paleoferroequine


AcroSauroTaurus

#28
My only uintathere... until I get CollectA's.

Figure: Unknown Uintatherium
I am the Dinosaur King!

suspsy

Quote from: AcroSauroTaurus on December 14, 2016, 01:40:59 AM
My only uintathere... until I get CollectA's.

Figure: Unknown Uintatherium

. . . that's a photo of arachnids.
Untitled by suspsy3, on Flickr

AcroSauroTaurus

I am the Dinosaur King!

stargatedalek

Now if only that scale of arachnid to uintathere was accurate, watching giant scorpions tear down hordes of marauding entelodonts, while tarantulas drag pachyderms into their burrows, would almost be to grandiose to picture! >:D

BlueKrono

We are accustomed to look upon the shackled form of a conquered monster, but there - there you could look at a thing monstrous and free." - King Kong, 2005


Jetoar

Remember this friends ^-^.

Narrow-nosed Rhinoceros (Stephanorinus hemitoechus). Scale 1:20. 5 inchs/ 12,7cm =  40$/ 37€

[Off Nick and Eddie's reactions to the dinosaurs] Oh yeah "Ooh, aah", that's how it always starts. But then there's running and screaming.



{about the T-Rex) When he sees us with his kid isn't he gonna be like "you"!?

My website: Paleo-Creatures
My website's facebook: Paleo-Creatures

Jose S.M.


bmathison1972

Does anyone know how the new CollectA Elasmotherium scales with others, such as the Safari woolly rhino? It is a DX model; images on STS forum make it look to big but the poster says it scales correctly with other rhino figures. My extant and woolly rhinos are all Safari figures.
thanks

Lanthanotus

Quote from: bmathison1972 on June 19, 2020, 01:48:08 PM
Does anyone know how the new CollectA Elasmotherium scales with others, such as the Safari woolly rhino? It is a DX model; images on STS forum make it look to big but the poster says it scales correctly with other rhino figures. My extant and woolly rhinos are all Safari figures.
thanks

I do not own the Safari Wolly Rhino, only the Bullyland one. I saw the Elasmotherium in a physical shop but refrained from buying it because it is HUGE. Not sure if it nevertheless scales well to other figure, but from a purely subjective view I`d say "no", it does not. If I imagine it being placed beside my Carnegie Mammoth or Eofauna figures, it would be much out of place. It is a splendid figure, but the size makes it a no go for me though I do not really collect for scale.

Halichoeres

I don't have either. Based on measurements given on CollectA's and Safari's web sites, and size estimates from Wikipedia, I get:

Elasmotherium sibiricum (4.5 m) vs. CollectA model 25.5 cm = 1:17.6
Elasmotherium caucasicum (5 m) vs. CollectA model = 1:19.6
Coelodonta antiquitatum (3.8 m) vs. Safari model 17.1 cm = 1:22.2

So it does seem the Elasmotherium is a little large, but maybe not egregiously so if it's E. caucasicum. I don't know enough about the genus to tell whether the figure represents one species over another.
In the kingdom of the blind, better take public transit. Well, in the kingdom of the sighted, too, really--almost everyone is a terrible driver.

My attempt to find the best toy of every species

My trade/sale/wishlist thread

Sometimes I draw pictures

RobinGoodfellow

#38







Halichoeres

Ah yes, that's better. It does look a little too large.
In the kingdom of the blind, better take public transit. Well, in the kingdom of the sighted, too, really--almost everyone is a terrible driver.

My attempt to find the best toy of every species

My trade/sale/wishlist thread

Sometimes I draw pictures

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: