Wierd/Curios Books & Media

[Ultimatedinoking]

still beats Jurassic Fight Club

Come on, that one was ok.

The following parodies sum up why they're both very bad. The only thing that might make CofD worse than JFC is the quote-mining.

I see your point.

And I blocked out the whole "parasaurwaffleus" thing.
Wasn't the quote mining about sauropod "second brains?"

[HD-man]

Wasn't the quote mining about sauropod "second brains?"

Yes ( http://svpow.com/2009/12/15/lies-damned-lies-and-clash-of-the-dinosaurs/ ).

[Ultimatedinoking]

Wasn't the quote mining about sauropod "second brains?"

Yes ( http://svpow.com/2009/12/15/lies-damned-lies-and-clash-of-the-dinosaurs/ ).

That's what I thought.

[stargatedalek]

still beats Jurassic Fight Club

Come on, that one was ok.

for entertainment value maybe...
but thats it...

those parodies are awesome, I'm totally gonna share those (if thats ok?)

[HD-man]

those parodies are awesome, I'm totally gonna share those (if thats ok?)

I think it's OK. They belong to Albertonykus ( http://albertonykus.deviantart.com ).

[stargatedalek]

thanks, feels good to spread the laughs

[Ultimatedinoking]

still beats Jurassic Fight Club

Come on, that one was ok.

for entertainment value maybe...
but thats it...

those parodies are awesome, I'm totally gonna share those (if thats ok?)

At least the cgi is better, cotds T. rex looked like a fleshy blob.

[stargatedalek]

indeed, but in the case when their CGI was less accurate, I still file that under entertainment value
of which JFC is not lacking

[Ultimatedinoking]

indeed, but in the case when their CGI was less accurate, I still file that under entertainment value
of which JFC is not lacking

So, which do you prefer?

[stargatedalek]

JFC from an entertainment perspective, Clash for actual accuracy

[Ultimatedinoking]

JFC from an entertainment perspective, Clash for actual accuracy

Accuracy?

Really?

[stargatedalek]

its allegedly a documentary, so yes accuracy does matter

[Ultimatedinoking]

its allegedly a documentary, so yes accuracy does matter

It has almost no accuracy though.

[Gwangi]

its allegedly a documentary, so yes accuracy does matter

It has almost no accuracy though.

The dinosaurs themselves are more accurately rendered. The information is equally bogus in both, maybe more so in JFC but it's been awhile since I watched it.

[stargatedalek]

I would say it is, but it was more wide branching in the scope of what it included, so naturally they had more to screw up

[Ultimatedinoking]

its allegedly a documentary, so yes accuracy does matter

It has almost no accuracy though.

The dinosaurs themselves are more accurately rendered. The information is equally bogus in both, maybe more so in JFC but it's been awhile since I watched it.

You mean blobosaurus rex from COTD?

[stargatedalek]

the JFC rex is no better, both lack feathers and have giant arms with pronated wrists
sure the JFC rex is nicer to look at, but its no more accurate



and do I really need to mention THIS

[Gwangi]

its allegedly a documentary, so yes accuracy does matter

It has almost no accuracy though.

The dinosaurs themselves are more accurately rendered. The information is equally bogus in both, maybe more so in JFC but it's been awhile since I watched it.

You mean blobosaurus rex from COTD?

Well specifically it was the "raptors" that came to mind but yes, even the Tyrannosaurus from COTD looked better than those in JFC.

EDIT: Actually Stargatedalek, I don't think the COTD rex had pronated arms. They were correct if I remember correctly.

[stargatedalek]

I think you might be right, its hard to tell from most of the pics I found

[Ultimatedinoking]

the JFC rex is no better, both lack feathers and have giant arms with pronated wrists
sure the JFC rex is nicer to look at, but its no more accurate



and do I really need to mention THIS

There's no proof T. rex had feathers.

What, you mean ol' blueface?