You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_Giganotosaurus

Jurassic World: Rebirth (July 2, 2025) 🦕

Started by Giganotosaurus, January 22, 2024, 08:12:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Blade-of-the-Moon

Quote from: Gwangi on January 25, 2025, 12:49:23 AM
Quote from: Blade-of-the-Moon on January 24, 2025, 10:36:22 PMThere are ruins in Trespasser the JP game.  So there is precedent in the franchise for them.

Also in the Jurassic Park: Ramage Edition game for the SEGA Genesis.  ^-^



Really? I didn't remember back that far but I did play the game. I think it's fine we get some IJ like scenes, I mean there a lot of films with similar ones, The Mummy, National Treasure, ect..


Gwangi

Quote from: Blade-of-the-Moon on January 25, 2025, 01:16:40 AMReally? I didn't remember back that far but I did play the game. I think it's fine we get some IJ like scenes, I mean there a lot of films with similar ones, The Mummy, National Treasure, ect..




HD-man

"Which Jurassic Park Novel Scene is Coming to Jurassic World Rebirth? David Koepp on Writing Sequel":

While probably the obvious scene (which already kinda got adapted for JP3), I'd love to see the novel's darkest scene adapted for the big screen, especially if the adapters are serious about going back to JP's horror roots:
Spoiler
[close]

1 more thing I recently found out about ( https://x.com/Brycenator100/status/1876459469023969482 ):
Spoiler
Quote⚠️RUMOR: These Are What Most Of The Main Creatures In Jurassic World Rebirth Will Look Like.

From Left To Right:

Spinosaurus
Triceratops
Parasaurolophus
Mosasaurus
Titanosaurus
Mutant
Quetzalcoatlus
Trex
Velociraptor.

❓Q: What Are Your Thoughts On These Rumored Designs?

Artwork Created By: ingenttoday on Instagram.
[close]
I'm also known as JD-man at deviantART: http://jd-man.deviantart.com/

Noideaforaname

Spoiler
That Titanosaurus sure seems inspired by an entirely different Titanosaurus:
Screenshot_20250129_085824_Brave.jpg
[close]

Blade-of-the-Moon

yeah i'm not thrilled with several of those designs if thats where they go.

Camzilla94

Quote from: Noideaforaname on January 29, 2025, 02:04:14 PM
Spoiler
That Titanosaurus sure seems inspired by an entirely different Titanosaurus:
Screenshot_20250129_085824_Brave.jpg
[close]
I'll be immensely happy if Gareth or someone in the design team had this in mind.

Pachyrhinosaurus

Spoiler
So this means Arlix is confirmed?  ::)
[close]

I would prefer if they tried for more consistent designs. The original JP dinosaurs are iconic and I feel like its a missed opportunity to not bring back the exact designs people are familiar with from previous films.
Artwork Collection Searchlist
Save Dinoland USA!

Amazon ad:

Blade-of-the-Moon

Quote from: Pachyrhinosaurus on January 29, 2025, 09:52:06 PM
Spoiler
So this means Arlix is confirmed?  ::)
[close]

I would prefer if they tried for more consistent designs. The original JP dinosaurs are iconic and I feel like its a missed opportunity to not bring back the exact designs people are familiar with from previous films.

For established species I agree. Maybe , except the Spinosaurus?  I've read the mosa design if different could be sexual dimorphism. I really don't care for the sails on titanosaurus..if you want to go that route use Amargasaurus.

Sim

#288
The redisigns are one of the two things making me interested in this new film.  I hate when the films in this franchise re-use the same highly inaccurate designs over and over again.  I find it boring and think it's pandering.  For all the hate JP3 gets, the Velociraptor designs in that film were the most interesting ones so far.  The designs of the prehistoric animals of the existing Jurassic World films were generally awful and I hope this new film will put more effort into each animal's appearance.  The second thing making me interested in the new film is Jonathan Bailey.  I'm interested in seeing how he does.

Edit: I only just saw the image which appears to show what the animals in the film will look like.  I had previously only read what the changes were.  I hope the animals in the film will look a bit better than what's shown in that image.

Camzilla94

#289
Quote from: Sim on January 30, 2025, 02:39:14 AMThe redisigns are one of the two things making me interested in this new film.  I hate when the films in this franchise re-use the same highly inaccurate designs over and over again.  I find it boring and think it's pandering.  For all the hate JP3 gets, the Velociraptor designs in that film were the most interesting ones so far.  The designs of the prehistoric animals of the existing Jurassic World films were generally awful and I hope this new film will put more effort into each animal's appearance.  The second thing making me interested in the new film is Jonathan Bailey.  I'm interested in seeing how he does.

Edit: I only just saw the image which appears to show what the animals in the film will look like.  I had previously only read what the changes were.  I hope the animals in the film will look a bit better than what's shown in that image.
They're definitely gonna look better since the image is just something someone put together using the film info when it comes to the designs. Idk there must be some BTS info leaking out but apparently in regards to the rex
Spoiler
Spielberg wanted it to be much uglier but Gareth fought to have it mostly the same. Hence those articles talking about how this movie was gonna have a Kong aesthetic with the dinos.
[close]
Also some merch leaked out giving a blurry look at the big 3 in the movie.

Sim

I also read the Velociraptor
Spoiler
will have quills again, which is better than no feathers at all in my opinion.
[close]

Torvosaurus

After Jurassic World, I lost all interest in the films. I waited until they were on TV. After 20 some years, that film would have been the perfect time to update the dinos to the latest paleontological views on dinosaurs. Instead they dusted off the Jurassic Park models and went full speed ahead with what they had. They did "update" some new creatures, like the Pyroraptor in Dominion, but they really ruined that with the swimming scene. The Giganotosaurus was a horrible design. I guess that in some ways the movies took Alan Grant's calling the dinos "monsters" in JP3 and ran with it.

Maybe this film will get me excited about the films again, but I'm not holding my breath.

Torvo
"In the fields of observation chance favors only the prepared mind." - Louis Pasteur

Blade-of-the-Moon

Quote from: Torvosaurus on January 31, 2025, 06:29:50 PMAfter Jurassic World, I lost all interest in the films. I waited until they were on TV. After 20 some years, that film would have been the perfect time to update the dinos to the latest paleontological views on dinosaurs. Instead they dusted off the Jurassic Park models and went full speed ahead with what they had. They did "update" some new creatures, like the Pyroraptor in Dominion, but they really ruined that with the swimming scene. The Giganotosaurus was a horrible design. I guess that in some ways the movies took Alan Grant's calling the dinos "monsters" in JP3 and ran with it.

Maybe this film will get me excited about the films again, but I'm not holding my breath.

Torvo

Oddly the Giganotosaurus acted the most like an animal in the film despite it's appearance.  I think the Pyro swimming was intended to be like the Dilophosaurus venom, something not expected? That falls in line with Crichton's work.


Sim

I too dislike the designs of the prehistoric animals in Jurassic World, the Stegosaurus was even more inaccurate than the one in The Lost World.  Although ironically the Jurassic World Pteranodon are an improvement on the ones in JP3 which I think have the only bad designs from that film, this is due to the JP3 Pteranodon inexcusably having teeth while the JW ones don't.  But the JP3 Pteranodon look more professionally done, a quality that all the prehistoric animals in the JP trilogy have while the ones in the existing JW films lack.  the JW Pyroraptor had good feathering, but for me it's ruined by the monster head they gave it, a head that doesn't look like any dromaeosaurid's.  I also don't understand what JW did with Atrociraptor.  The JP franchise's Velociraptor are based on Deinonychus which is why they have the size that they have, why did they make Atrociraptor the same size?  And without feathers?  I am also surprised that Atrociraptor
Spoiler
apparently won't be in Jurassic World Rebirth, I got the impression they might have been trying to replace Velociraptor with it.
[close]

I read about the redisigned, returning and new species in JWR in the following link, possible spoilers of course for both the animals and the plot: https://www.reddit.com/r/JurassicPark/comments/1hpd6hl/jurassic_world_rebirth_plot_leak_updated/?rdt=63692

Gwangi

It's odd that what I (and many others) consider the worst films in the franchise have the best dinosaur designs; JP3 and Dominion. I mean, JP3 has some stinkers (Brachiosaurus and Ceratosaurus) but at least they weren't afraid to play around with colors and patterns. Meanwhile, I'm a staunch defender of Jurassic World and consider it the best Jurassic Park sequel but the dinosaur designs are the worst in the franchise and indefensible. I did like the Indominus though, especially compared to the later hybrids and dino-villains.

stargatedalek

#295
Quote from: Sim on January 31, 2025, 08:15:53 PMI too dislike the designs of the prehistoric animals in Jurassic World, the Stegosaurus was even more inaccurate than the one in The Lost World.  Although ironically the Jurassic World Pteranodon are an improvement on the ones in JP3 which I think have the only bad designs from that film, this is due to the JP3 Pteranodon inexcusably having teeth while the JW ones don't.  But the JP3 Pteranodon look more professionally done, a quality that all the prehistoric animals in the JP trilogy have while the ones in the existing JW films lack.
I disagree heavily that the JW Pteranodon is more accurate than the JP3 one. The JP3 Pteranodon has only two serious errors; the presence of teeth, and being entirely bald (and the teeth are relatively discreet). The JW Pteranodon is bald, shrink-wrapped, has weird torso proportions, has a weird skull shape, and the wrong number of digits.

I agree on JP3 and Dominion having the best designs. Quetzalcoatlus and Oviraptor in particular, despite their own slew of accuracy issues, are probably the two most grounded feeling designs in the series (aesthetically only in the case of Quetz).
Trans rights are human rights.


Faelrin

I love JPIII. It's a silly movie that doesn't overdue its stay. It also feels more grounded when compared to the later World films for me.

As far as the World film's creature designs, per film, I'll list the ones I liked the most:

-Parasaurolophus (both JW and Dominion)
-Indominus rex
-Carnotaurus (with the exception of the elbows)
-Stygimoloch
-Nasutoceratops (easily the best ceratopsian design in the World era of films, minus the elephant feet)
-Allosaurus (post BaBR design, which is basically the classic Papo figure gone full circle, although the FK design isn't all that bad either)
-Moros (other then being undersized)
-Quetzalcoatlus (other then being oversized; really need a HC figure of this one)
-Pyroraptor (except the head, but a nearly correct fully feathered raptor in a Jurassic movie was a sight to behold, despite its poor use in the final film. Ended up getting outdone by JWE2's Utahraptor though)
-Therizinosaurus (just the feet could use correcting, maybe the head shape, but we have no skull for it anyways)

While the skull is wrong, I also like the Lystrosaurus. Glad to have figures of it, and in JWE2 now.

Everything else kind of either suffers from poor design direction in some way or another (Stegosaurus with lips and droopy tail, Pachyrhinosaurus turned Sinoceratops, too much crocodile in the genome, too many teeth, bland coloration on a lot of the creatures, eyes in the wrong skull holes with Microceratus, though the colors were nice on it, etc). I hope Rebirth goes back to the Jurassic Park films design direction. I hope the rumored Spinosaurus is based on the post 2020 style with a large sail, and paddle like tail, if it isn't a return of the JPIII individual. I hope the new Quetzalcoatlus design has feathers once again.
Film Accurate Mattel JW and JP toys list (incl. extended canon species, etc):
http://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=6702

Every Single Mainline Mattel Jurassic World Species A-Z; 2025 toys added!:
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9974.0

Most produced Paleozoic genera (visual encyclopedia):
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9144.0

Sim

Quote from: stargatedalek on January 31, 2025, 09:41:06 PMI disagree heavily that the JW Pteranodon is more accurate than the JP3 one. The JP3 Pteranodon has only two serious errors; the presence of teeth, and being entirely bald (and the teeth are relatively discreet). The JW Pteranodon is bald, shrink-wrapped, has weird torso proportions, has a weird skull shape, and the wrong number of digits.
I hadn't noticed the JW Pteranodon has only three toes on each foot.  It's terrible and gives me even more reason to think the people responsible for the Jurassic World designs are mostly incompetent.  The skull shape of the JW Pteranodon looks to be in line with that of female Pteranodon though.  And I think the JP3 Pteranodon is shrink-wrapped too.  For me it's a tie between the two now.

Quote from: stargatedalek on January 31, 2025, 09:41:06 PMI agree on JP3 and Dominion having the best designs. Quetzalcoatlus and Oviraptor in particular, despite their own slew of accuracy issues, are probably the two most grounded feeling designs in the series (aesthetically only in the case of Quetz).
I feel the best designs in the series are those of the Compsognathus, Parasaurolophus, Corythosaurus, Pachycephalosaurus and Stygimoloch.  All ones where one can't really do anything wrong to.

Quote from: Faelrin on January 31, 2025, 09:45:13 PMI hope the rumored Spinosaurus is based on the post 2020 style with a large sail, and paddle like tail, if it isn't a return of the JPIII individual.
Spoiler
According to the rumour the Spinosaurus in JWR has been redisgned to look like the modern version of Spinosaurus.
[close]

HD-man

"TRAILER NEXT WEEK! Jurassic World Rebirth SUPER BOWL TV SPOT TRAILER IS COMING Sunday 9th February":
I'm also known as JD-man at deviantART: http://jd-man.deviantart.com/

Faelrin

New teaser just dropped:

https://old.reddit.com/r/JurassicPark/comments/1igu365/jurassic_world_rebirth_teaser_trailer_wednesday/

Trailer is coming out Wednesday. Surprised to see it out sooner then the Super Bowl TV spot tbh. Can't wait.

Spoiler
Love the Titanosaurus(?) tail tease that we got there.
[close]
Film Accurate Mattel JW and JP toys list (incl. extended canon species, etc):
http://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=6702

Every Single Mainline Mattel Jurassic World Species A-Z; 2025 toys added!:
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9974.0

Most produced Paleozoic genera (visual encyclopedia):
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9144.0

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: