You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_SpartanSquat

Spinosaurus new look!

Started by SpartanSquat, August 14, 2014, 06:27:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Trisdino on August 14, 2014, 06:56:05 PM
This spino does not look bloody fat. Stocky? Yes, but that is not the same as fat.

And shrink wrapped is NOT the same as fit.
Yes, it looks stocky and powerfully built as it should.

Definitely not, that is how to absolutely never ever draw dinosaurs.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."


Gwangi

I think part of what makes it so low slung looking is that it is resting on the entirety of its foot and not just the toes as it climbs up out of the water. Still looks low slung though, even just based on the skeleton. An interesting interpretation. Hopefully we hear more about this new material soon.

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Gwangi on August 14, 2014, 06:58:01 PM
I think part of what makes it so low slung looking is that it is resting on the entirety of its foot and not just the toes as it climbs up out of the water. Still looks low slung though, even just based on the skeleton. An interesting interpretation. Hopefully we hear more about this new material soon.
I know, I can't wait to know more. After Spinosaurus is one of my favorite dinosaurs.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 06:58:55 PM
4 % Spinosaurus

96% rolls.
So you'd rather a Spinosaurus with no muscles or organs like those by Gregory S. Paul?

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 07:00:17 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 06:58:55 PM
4 % Spinosaurus

96% rolls.
So you'd rather a Spinosaurus with no muscles or organs like those by Gregory S. Paul?
id like Paulian Dinos over these lumps of fat.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

#26
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:02:52 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 07:00:17 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 06:58:55 PM
4 % Spinosaurus

96% rolls.
So you'd rather a Spinosaurus with no muscles or organs like those by Gregory S. Paul?
id like Paulian Dinos over these lumps of fat.
So, you'd rather something that is nothing but skin and bones over a fit, well-fed animal. Wow :o. Besides this is much more likely, after all, you know animals do have more than just skin stretched over bones with nothing in between (like you know flesh).

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Amazon ad:

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 07:03:51 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:02:52 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 07:00:17 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 06:58:55 PM
4 % Spinosaurus

96% rolls.
So you'd rather a Spinosaurus with no muscles or organs like those by Gregory S. Paul?
id like Paulian Dinos over these lumps of fat.
So, you'd rather something that is nothing but skin and bones over a fit, well-fed animal. Wow :o.

Well fed? On what? Cookies? Cakes? These spinos look like themed have a hard time getting around, and what's with the broken fin? It's not becklespinax.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

stargatedalek

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 06:48:51 PM
What's wrong with that? At least it isn't shrink-wrapped.
it is shrink wrapped, well the sail is


Paulian dinosaurs are outdated, shrink wrapping does not depict "healthy/fit" animals, it depicts emaciated starving ones



Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:07:09 PM
Well fed? On what? Cookies? Cakes? These spinos look like themed have a hard time getting around, and what's with the broken fin? It's not becklespinax.
did you even TRY to figure out what people were discussing before you showed up and started trying to impose retrosaurs upon us?!

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:07:09 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 07:03:51 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:02:52 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 07:00:17 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 06:58:55 PM
4 % Spinosaurus

96% rolls.
So you'd rather a Spinosaurus with no muscles or organs like those by Gregory S. Paul?
id like Paulian Dinos over these lumps of fat.
So, you'd rather something that is nothing but skin and bones over a fit, well-fed animal. Wow :o.

Well fed? On what? Cookies? Cakes? These spinos look like themed have a hard time getting around, and what's with the broken fin? It's not becklespinax.
Maybe a better way to put it would be a perfectly healthy individual, unlike Paul's dinos which look like they haven't eaten since they hatched.

It isn't broken, the new remains suggest that is what it actually looked like.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Trisdino

This here is called an animal - It is alive



It may look fat, but it recks stuff up




Yutyrannus

#31
Quote from: stargatedalek on August 14, 2014, 07:08:58 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 06:48:51 PM
What's wrong with that? At least it isn't shrink-wrapped.
it is shrink wrapped, well the sail is


Paulian dinosaurs are outdated, shrink wrapping does not depict "healthy/fit" animals, it depicts emaciated starving ones


Perhaps but we don't know whether that was a sail or a hump. Besides it isn't so shrink-wrapped that you can see the bones.

Thanks for the picture, that really explains my point :).

EDIT: Wait what's that in the whale's mouth? That isn't preserved in the fossils, I think you're being way too speculative :)).

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: stargatedalek on August 14, 2014, 07:08:58 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 06:48:51 PM
What's wrong with that? At least it isn't shrink-wrapped.
it is shrink wrapped, well the sail is


Paulian dinosaurs are outdated, shrink wrapping does not depict "healthy/fit" animals, it depicts emaciated starving ones



Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:07:09 PM
Well fed? On what? Cookies? Cakes? These spinos look like themed have a hard time getting around, and what's with the broken fin? It's not becklespinax.
did you even TRY to figure out what people were discussing before you showed up and started trying to impose retrosaurs upon us?!

Retrosaurs! Yes! I'm going to start using that! Thanks  :))

That parasaur looks better than the all yesterdays ones, were their so tubby, they have no neck. Yet have toothpick arms...

P.s. Whales are suppose to be fatty, why are you comparing dinosaurs to whales?
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK


Yutyrannus

#33
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:12:06 PM

Retrosaurs! Yes! I'm going to start using that! Thanks  :))

That parasaur looks better than the all yesterdays ones, were their so tubby, they have no neck. Yet have toothpick arms...

P.s. Whales are suppose to be fatty, why are you comparing dinosaurs to whales?
Because that whale isn't just lacking blubber, it's lacking flesh as well, although apparently you think dinosaurs were just walking skeletons.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Trisdino

Tell me ultimatedinoking, what animal is this?


Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Trisdino on August 14, 2014, 07:15:51 PM
Tell me ultimatedinoking, what animal is this?



Wooly rhino, obviously.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

#36
And these too. (without looking through the comments)

http://yoult.deviantart.com/#/art/Mammal-Revolution-394442470?hf=1

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:17:12 PM
Quote from: Trisdino on August 14, 2014, 07:15:51 PM
Tell me ultimatedinoking, what animal is this?



Wooly rhino, obviously.
Yeah, you probably should've cut out the picture in the corner, Trisdino.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

#39
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 07:18:55 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 07:17:22 PM
And these too.

http://yoult.deviantart.com/#/art/Mammal-Revolution-394442470?hf=1

The main pics seems to be homo vs. Panthera.

The tiny one is a freaky chicken man.
The tiny one is also a human. Basically drawing dinosaurs shrink-wrapped is like drawing tigers and humans like that.

EDIT: Also, we should probably move this discussion somewhere else.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: