News:

Poll time! Cast your votes for the best stegosaur toys, the best ceratopsoid toys (excluding Triceratops), and the best allosauroid toys (excluding Allosaurus) of all time! Some of the polls have been reset to include some recent releases, so please vote again, even if you voted previously.

Main Menu

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_Yutyrannus

Whale Evolution

Started by Yutyrannus, August 17, 2014, 02:20:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 17, 2014, 04:49:33 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 17, 2014, 04:45:59 AM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 17, 2014, 04:40:16 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 17, 2014, 04:31:07 AM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 17, 2014, 04:15:45 AM
Whale skulls don't have them.

Are you talking about the tiny pits above the premolars? Or the. Large holes on the lower jaw, those are nerve openings.
I never said modern whales have them.

The tiny pits.

I know, someone asked if whales had pits.

Ok.
They said embryonic whales had whiskers.

I ment whale skulls.  :-[
I know.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."


Ultimatedinoking

I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

stargatedalek

Pits are more indicative of functioning whiskers, whereas embryonic whiskers seem vestigial in cetacea

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: stargatedalek on August 17, 2014, 05:12:32 AM
Pits are more indicative of functioning whiskers, whereas embryonic whiskers seem vestigial in cetacea

Like chicken teeth.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 17, 2014, 05:14:28 AM
Quote from: stargatedalek on August 17, 2014, 05:12:32 AM
Pits are more indicative of functioning whiskers, whereas embryonic whiskers seem vestigial in cetacea

Like chicken teeth.
Yes. So if modern cetaceans have embryonic whiskers than their ancestors must have had them at some point, right?

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

Okay, so my guess is Pakicetus probably had them, but what about Maiacetus?

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 17, 2014, 05:36:01 AM
Okay, so my guess is Pakicetus probably had them, but what about Maiacetus?

Mom whale? Maybe.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Balaur

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 17, 2014, 05:42:48 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 17, 2014, 05:36:01 AM
Okay, so my guess is Pakicetus probably had them, but what about Maiacetus?

Mom whale? Maybe.

I'm thinking like those seen in the manatee.

Yutyrannus

I'm not sure, because it seems Maiacetus is more closely related to Rodhocetus and other more advanced proto-whales than to Ambulocetus, Pakicetus and their relatives.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."


Yutyrannus

Quote from: Balaur on August 17, 2014, 05:44:24 AM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 17, 2014, 05:42:48 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 17, 2014, 05:36:01 AM
Okay, so my guess is Pakicetus probably had them, but what about Maiacetus?

Mom whale? Maybe.

I'm thinking like those seen in the manatee.
Perhaps, although they would have had quite different lifestyles.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Balaur

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 17, 2014, 05:46:24 AM
Quote from: Balaur on August 17, 2014, 05:44:24 AM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 17, 2014, 05:42:48 AM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 17, 2014, 05:36:01 AM
Okay, so my guess is Pakicetus probably had them, but what about Maiacetus?

Mom whale? Maybe.

I'm thinking like those seen in the manatee.
Perhaps, although they would have had quite different lifestyles.

Well, at that point, they woudl become vistigial.

Yutyrannus


"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Balaur

If Maiacetus had whiskers, and the whiskers were like a manatee's, they would serve no further purpose.

Yutyrannus

True, I'm leaning towards not putting whiskers on Maiacetus, but putting them on Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, and Himalayacetus (if I can find a place to add it into the series).

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus


"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus


"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Yutyrannus

Also, what is the first prehistoric whale thought to have had a melon?

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: