Reconstructing soft anatomy

[Ultimatedinoking]

Ok.

[Yutyrannus]

So, what else is wrong with that tyrannosaur I posted?

[Ultimatedinoking]

No you said it's wrong because it looks like a whale.

Also, what, to you, is wrong with depicting dinosaurs like this?
http://gspauldino.com/images/OldDaspleto.jpg

By having smooth skin, even though we know they had scales.

It's tails too small, and the pelvic bones are too pronounced.

For the last time it has scales! I just didn't draw them so that I could color it without smearing the pencil lines.

And?

It's legs are too skinny.

[Yutyrannus]

No you said it's wrong because it looks like a whale.

Also, what, to you, is wrong with depicting dinosaurs like this?
http://gspauldino.com/images/OldDaspleto.jpg

By having smooth skin, even though we know they had scales.

It's tails too small, and the pelvic bones are too pronounced.

For the last time it has scales! I just didn't draw them so that I could color it without smearing the pencil lines.

And?

It's legs are too skinny.

And?

[stargatedalek]

Fist it gets a croc head, now croc legs?

actually, its head is more similar to a gharial or a dolphin, the Jurassic Park styled crocodile snout is now outdated

I don't like the title of this thread, it is snarky, and not befitting for an "open and friendly community" like ours. How about if I change it to "Reconstructing soft anatomy"?

well, it really was created more as a response to UDK's "persistence" so I believe its no more snarky or aggressive than UDK's deliberately ignoring evidence

[Ultimatedinoking]

No you said it's wrong because it looks like a whale.

Also, what, to you, is wrong with depicting dinosaurs like this?
http://gspauldino.com/images/OldDaspleto.jpg

By having smooth skin, even though we know they had scales.

It's tails too small, and the pelvic bones are too pronounced.

For the last time it has scales! I just didn't draw them so that I could color it without smearing the pencil lines.

And?

It's legs are too skinny.

And?

The arms are too thin.

[Yutyrannus]

No you said it's wrong because it looks like a whale.

Also, what, to you, is wrong with depicting dinosaurs like this?
http://gspauldino.com/images/OldDaspleto.jpg

By having smooth skin, even though we know they had scales.

It's tails too small, and the pelvic bones are too pronounced.

For the last time it has scales! I just didn't draw them so that I could color it without smearing the pencil lines.

And?

It's legs are too skinny.

And?

The arms are too thin.

What else?

[Balaur]

well, it really was created more as a response to UDK's "persistence" so I believe its no more snarky or aggressive than UDK's deliberately ignoring evidence

Even though I think UDK is wrong, I really don't like the title. It doesn't seem something that would exist on a friendly and open forum.

[tyrantqueen]

By having smooth skin, even though we know they had scales.

It's tails too small, and the pelvic bones are too pronounced.

Given the scale at which the art was drawn in, the scales would probably not have been visible anyway. Mosasaurs seem to have had quite fine, pebbly scales:

[Ultimatedinoking]

No you said it's wrong because it looks like a whale.

Also, what, to you, is wrong with depicting dinosaurs like this?
http://gspauldino.com/images/OldDaspleto.jpg

By having smooth skin, even though we know they had scales.

It's tails too small, and the pelvic bones are too pronounced.

For the last time it has scales! I just didn't draw them so that I could color it without smearing the pencil lines.

And?

It's legs are too skinny.

And?

The arms are too thin.

What else?

Nothin.

[Yutyrannus]

Nothin.

No you can see its bones from under the skin!

[Ultimatedinoking]

Nothin.

No you can see its bones from under the skin!

Ok ok ok! It's under nourished!

[Yutyrannus]

Nothin.

No you can see its bones from under the skin!

Ok ok ok! It's under nourished!

UNDER NOURISHED? That probably hasn't eaten in its whole life!

[Ultimatedinoking]

Nothin.

No you can see its bones from under the skin!

Ok ok ok! It's under nourished!

UNDER NOURISHED? That probably hasn't eaten in its whole life!

Ok!

[Ultimatedinoking]

http://www.wallconvert.com/wallpapers/animals/brachiosaurus-9195.html#

No.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130616163246/jurassicpark/images/d/d4/Brach_female.jpg

Yes

[Balaur]

http://www.wallconvert.com/wallpapers/animals/brachiosaurus-9195.html#

No.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130616163246/jurassicpark/images/d/d4/Brach_female.jpg

Yes

I agree. There's a good start.

Edit: I guess I was saying the second is better than the first.

[Yutyrannus]

http://www.wallconvert.com/wallpapers/animals/brachiosaurus-9195.html#

No.

No.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130616163246/jurassicpark/images/d/d4/Brach_female.jpg

Yes

No.

[Yutyrannus]

http://www.wallconvert.com/wallpapers/animals/brachiosaurus-9195.html#

No.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130616163246/jurassicpark/images/d/d4/Brach_female.jpg

Yes

I agree. There's a good start.

Wouldn't this be more like it?
http://shop.modellpferdeversand.de/images/product_images/popup_images/5401_2.jpg

[Balaur]

http://www.wallconvert.com/wallpapers/animals/brachiosaurus-9195.html#

No.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130616163246/jurassicpark/images/d/d4/Brach_female.jpg

Yes

I agree. There's a good start.

Wouldn't this be more like it?
http://shop.modellpferdeversand.de/images/product_images/popup_images/5401_2.jpg

That's a little shrink wrapped, but a little better.

[Yutyrannus]

http://www.wallconvert.com/wallpapers/animals/brachiosaurus-9195.html#

No.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130616163246/jurassicpark/images/d/d4/Brach_female.jpg

Yes

I agree. There's a good start.

Wouldn't this be more like it?
http://shop.modellpferdeversand.de/images/product_images/popup_images/5401_2.jpg

That's a little shrink wrapped, but a little better.

I mean by the correct shaped head and correct feet.