You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

T

Reconstructing soft anatomy

Started by Trisdino, August 14, 2014, 07:27:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Balaur on August 14, 2014, 08:54:04 PM
We're not talking about the thorny sail. How does that make it less of an animal anyways?
True, there are spiny animals, but I've never visualized dinosaurs that way.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."


Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 08:53:59 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:52:11 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 08:49:45 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:47:44 PM

...it's not a croc.

Maybe the new finds a mistake! Spino lived with sarcosuchus! Maybe the new legs belong to a mega croc! They were mixed up after death!
What is your problem? Why can't you just see dinosaurs as what they are, animals not monsters.

Uh, have you seen crocodils limbs? There's is no way they could get mixed up with theropod legs, they're totally different!

I do! But making them tubby and thorn covered doesn't make them animals.

... It was just a hope.
There is no reason to make them so spiny, I agree, but they were stocky and muscular animals, they weren't walking skeletons!

Why would you hope that, Spinosaurus gets cooler with every new discovery.

But they wernt walking globs of fat either!

I don't think theirs enough proof for us to redesign the legs.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Balaur

How do you know they aren't globs of fat? Also, how much fat depends on the animal. I don't think Spinosaurus was so chubby, that it couldn't walk.

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:55:40 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 08:53:59 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:52:11 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 08:49:45 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:47:44 PM

...it's not a croc.

Maybe the new finds a mistake! Spino lived with sarcosuchus! Maybe the new legs belong to a mega croc! They were mixed up after death!
What is your problem? Why can't you just see dinosaurs as what they are, animals not monsters.

Uh, have you seen crocodils limbs? There's is no way they could get mixed up with theropod legs, they're totally different!

I do! But making them tubby and thorn covered doesn't make them animals.

... It was just a hope.
There is no reason to make them so spiny, I agree, but they were stocky and muscular animals, they weren't walking skeletons!

Why would you hope that, Spinosaurus gets cooler with every new discovery.

But they wernt walking globs of fat either!

I don't think theirs enough proof for us to redesign the legs.
That picture isn't! It depicts a healthy, very fit animal.

Maybe not, we'll have to wait for the paper, but it makes a lot of sense to me really.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Balaur on August 14, 2014, 08:56:54 PM
How do you know they aren't globs of fat? Also, how much fat depends on the animal. I don't think Spinosaurus was so chubby, that it couldn't walk.

There's no proof it was.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:58:18 PM
Quote from: Balaur on August 14, 2014, 08:56:54 PM
How do you know they aren't globs of fat? Also, how much fat depends on the animal. I don't think Spinosaurus was so chubby, that it couldn't walk.

There's no proof it was.
There's no proof it wasn't.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 08:59:03 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:58:18 PM
Quote from: Balaur on August 14, 2014, 08:56:54 PM
How do you know they aren't globs of fat? Also, how much fat depends on the animal. I don't think Spinosaurus was so chubby, that it couldn't walk.

There's no proof it was.
There's no proof it wasn't.

It's bones should have been thicker, or more massively built.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Amazon ad:

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:00:20 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 08:59:03 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 08:58:18 PM
Quote from: Balaur on August 14, 2014, 08:56:54 PM
How do you know they aren't globs of fat? Also, how much fat depends on the animal. I don't think Spinosaurus was so chubby, that it couldn't walk.

There's no proof it was.
There's no proof it wasn't.

It's bones should have been thicker, or more massively built.
Um, no.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

Go ahead if you wish. Anyway, and this is the last time I'm going to say this, that Spinosaurus is NOT FAT! It is fit and healthy just as it should be.

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Balaur

Well, Velociraptor was not shrink wrapped for sure. It had feathers so it would resemble a pigeon. :))

I actually thought we were talking about dinosaurs in general.

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Balaur on August 14, 2014, 09:04:13 PM
Well, Velociraptor was not shrink wrapped for sure. It had feathers so it would resemble a pigeon. :))

I actually thought we were talking about dinosaurs in general.

Yes, but it became spinocentric.

No.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

Here, Ultimatedinoking, what is wrong with depicting a mosasaur like this?

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."


Yutyrannus

#73
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:05:57 PM
Quote from: Balaur on August 14, 2014, 09:04:13 PM
Well, Velociraptor was not shrink wrapped for sure. It had feathers so it would resemble a pigeon. :))

I actually thought we were talking about dinosaurs in general.

Yes, but it became spinocentric.

No.
Yes. All of those bald Jurassic Park "raptors" had the feathers eaten away by a terrible mite known as Spielbergia :)).

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:06:06 PM
Here, Ultimatedinoking, what is wrong with depicting a mosasaur like this?


It doesn't have scales.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Balaur

#75
*Facepalm*  That's not the point of this!

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:08:29 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:06:06 PM
Here, Ultimatedinoking, what is wrong with depicting a mosasaur like this?


It doesn't have scales.
Yes, it does you just can't see them. What else?

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:09:35 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:08:29 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:06:06 PM
Here, Ultimatedinoking, what is wrong with depicting a mosasaur like this?


It doesn't have scales.
Yes, it does you just can't see them. What else?

It looks like a whale.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Yutyrannus

Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:10:28 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:09:35 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:08:29 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:06:06 PM
Here, Ultimatedinoking, what is wrong with depicting a mosasaur like this?


It doesn't have scales.
Yes, it does you just can't see them. What else?

It looks like a whale.
Okay, what's wrong with that? It lived like a whale so why shouldn't it look like one?

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

Ultimatedinoking

Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:11:34 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:10:28 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:09:35 PM
Quote from: Ultimatedinoking on August 14, 2014, 09:08:29 PM
Quote from: Yutyrannus on August 14, 2014, 09:06:06 PM
Here, Ultimatedinoking, what is wrong with depicting a mosasaur like this?


It doesn't have scales.
Yes, it does you just can't see them. What else?

It looks like a whale.
Okay, what's wrong with that? It lived like a whale so why shouldn't it look like one?

No, it lived like a marine varanid, so it should look a varanid.
I may not like feathered dinosaurs and stumpy legged Spinosaurs, but I will keep those opinions to myself, I will not start a debate over it, I promise. 😇
-UDK

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: