Papo on Science Daily

[morrijos]

Oh the irony.

Papo dinosaurs featured in a photo along with a detailed, scientifically accurate article:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121102151954.htm

[SBell]

Out of all the companies, Papo seems to be the one used for so many images, books, articles, etc. Not quite sure why.

[Takama]

Mybe its due to the fact that millions of people still like there inaccurate Jurrasic park dinosaurs

[SBell]

Mybe its due to the fact that millions of people still like there inaccurate Jurrasic park dinosaurs

I think they are just commonly photographed and raved about on forums dedicated to dinosaurs

[STORMnlNIJMEGEN]

i think that the Papo dinosaurs are the best there is

[Takama]

i think that the Papo dinosaurs are the best there is

only in terms of Detail,   In terms of accracey, thaey are nothing but a mere joke

[DinoToyForum]

Out of all the companies, Papo seems to be the one used for so many images, books, articles, etc. Not quite sure why.

It's because they look awesome. Inaccurate, but awesome. Except the plesiosaur, I don't think that one looks good, even superficially.

[tyrantqueen]

I guess Papo make good eye candy, even if they are scientifically inaccurate

[Balaur]

Oh the irony.

Papo dinosaurs featured in a photo along with a detailed, scientifically accurate article:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121102151954.htm

HA! 

[SBell]

Out of all the companies, Papo seems to be the one used for so many images, books, articles, etc. Not quite sure why.

It's because they look awesome. Inaccurate, but awesome. Except the plesiosaur, I don't think that one looks good, even superficially.

Or the mosasaur--I can't see that one showing up on an article either