News:

Poll time! Cast your votes for the best stegosaur toys, the best ceratopsoid toys (excluding Triceratops), and the best allosauroid toys (excluding Allosaurus) of all time! Some of the polls have been reset to include some recent releases, so please vote again, even if you voted previously.

Main Menu

You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_Concavenator

CollectA New Spinosaurus (based on most recent information)

Started by Concavenator, November 22, 2014, 04:47:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Roselaar

Oh wow, that is one awesome new Spinosaur! And there's two more coming this year?! Fabulous!

Collecta truly is the most daring and respectable of the current dinosaur figure companies. If only the rest of them would follow their example...


Bokisaurus

Awesome! Truly a surprise to have 3 new spinosaurus! Go CollectA!

TJ_Terrorsaur

I can not wait to see the images of the other two! I'm already dying to buy the deluxe one seeing as how Spinosaurus has always had a special place in my heart. I want to preorder one already. This year 2015 I feel is going to be one of the best years for dinosaur collectors. I'm eagerly bouncing from foot to foot for CollectA, Papo, Schleich and everyone else whom I collect from, not to mention all of the Jurassic World merch.
I feel like this year is going to be great!

triceratops83

I'm not even into Theropod figures but I want this and am dying to see the other two.
In the end it was not guns or bombs that defeated the aliens, but that humblest of all God's creatures... the Tyrannosaurus rex.

tanystropheus

Figures like these really make me wish that I had some decent painting skills...

Blade-of-the-Moon

Quote from: tanystropheus on January 09, 2015, 11:18:51 AM
Figures like these really make me wish that I had some decent painting skills...

That's why the talented artists in the Art section of the forum are here! :)

amargasaurus cazaui

Quote from: Roselaar on January 08, 2015, 12:18:33 PM
Oh wow, that is one awesome new Spinosaur! And there's two more coming this year?! Fabulous!

Collecta truly is the most daring and respectable of the current dinosaur figure companies. If only the rest of them would follow their example...
Not sure I would use the terms daring or respectable...the term capitalizing comes to mind however. Have to hand it to them for that part, cashing in on the latest news .to me thats entirely a different concept than daring or respectable.....
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


Blade-of-the-Moon

Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on January 09, 2015, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Roselaar on January 08, 2015, 12:18:33 PM
Oh wow, that is one awesome new Spinosaur! And there's two more coming this year?! Fabulous!

Collecta truly is the most daring and respectable of the current dinosaur figure companies. If only the rest of them would follow their example...
Not sure I would use the terms daring or respectable...the term capitalizing comes to mind however. Have to hand it to them for that part, cashing in on the latest news .to me thats entirely a different concept than daring or respectable.....


The daring part would be them trying to sell something that is new and a many still think is odd I suppose.  I certainly wouldn't feel comfortable creating a 1:1 Spinosaurus like this quite yet.

amargasaurus cazaui

Quote from: Blade-of-the-Moon on January 09, 2015, 05:04:26 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on January 09, 2015, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Roselaar on January 08, 2015, 12:18:33 PM
Oh wow, that is one awesome new Spinosaur! And there's two more coming this year?! Fabulous!

Collecta truly is the most daring and respectable of the current dinosaur figure companies. If only the rest of them would follow their example...
Not sure I would use the terms daring or respectable...the term capitalizing comes to mind however. Have to hand it to them for that part, cashing in on the latest news .to me thats entirely a different concept than daring or respectable.....
and thats precisely why it isnt daring....it will sell regardless with all the hype..and if its wrong so what right? Isnt like they havent made other models incorrect....and as long as they make a buck.....


The daring part would be them trying to sell something that is new and a many still think is odd I suppose.  I certainly wouldn't feel comfortable creating a 1:1 Spinosaurus like this quite yet.
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


Sim

Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on January 09, 2015, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Roselaar on January 08, 2015, 12:18:33 PM
Oh wow, that is one awesome new Spinosaur! And there's two more coming this year?! Fabulous!

Collecta truly is the most daring and respectable of the current dinosaur figure companies. If only the rest of them would follow their example...
Not sure I would use the terms daring or respectable...the term capitalizing comes to mind however. Have to hand it to them for that part, cashing in on the latest news .to me thats entirely a different concept than daring or respectable.....
I have similar thoughts to you, amargasaurus...  Respectable isn't what comes to mind when I think of CollectA.  I think they have some decent figures, and their motivations and ethics are better than some of the other companies.  However I dislike a lot of the aesthetic choices in their figures, which sometimes don't seem plausible.  Examples:
-The patches of feathers that stick out on their Therizinosauruses (if there's an animal with feathers like this let me know!).
-The bumps around the eyes and mouth of their Pliosaurus.  I can't think of any reason it would have these yet not having them seems most likely as that makes it more streamlined.
-The sunken pads under the feet of at least some of their sauropods, like their Diplodocus, Argentinosaurus and Ampelosaurus.
-In 2013 releasing a Diplodocus, Daspletosaurus, Ankylosaurus, Diabloceratops and Parasaurolophus all of which had red and white heads!  (Perhaps this is more something I consider a poor aesthetic choice.)
I'm also still very surprised that for their Medusaceratops they just took their Xenoceratops sculpt, tilted its head upwards and altered its horns! Their Nasutoceratops also has the exact same body and limbs as their Xenoceratops, which I would've found more surprising if they hadn't recycled the WHOLE sculpt for the Medusaceratops!
So I don't think CollectA is the most respectable of the current prehistoric animal toy companies, and I don't want other companies to follow CollectA's examples.  Something I definitely don't consider respectable is recycling sculpts for entirely new species.  That said, I'm fine with CollectA going about things the way it is, and I prefer them to some of the other prehistoric animal toy companies.


stargatedalek

the patches of feathers, I'm not sure if you mean the crests or just the random clumps, crests are far from rare amongst modern dinosaurs, and I've spent enough time around emus to say with confidence that the seemingly random clumps are possibly just attempts to show movement in the sculpt

Daspletodave

Hi Sim! I agree with you totally that Collecta just recycled their Xenoceratops sculpt for their Medusaceratops and Nasutoceratops.
That's why I got the Safari Nasutoceratops instead (and plan on getting the Battat one too).

Sim

Quote from: stargatedalek on January 09, 2015, 11:37:58 PM
the patches of feathers, I'm not sure if you mean the crests or just the random clumps, crests are far from rare amongst modern dinosaurs, and I've spent enough time around emus to say with confidence that the seemingly random clumps are possibly just attempts to show movement in the sculpt
I was referring to the raised feathers on the back of the smaller Therizinosaurus and the back and tail of the deluxe Therizinosaurus, not their crests.  I looked at emu pictures on Google images but the only raised feathers I saw were nowhere near the extent on the 2 Therizinosauruses, or on the front of the emu which I'm guessing was due to wind.  Have you seen raised feather clumps like on the 2 Therizinosauruses in extent and location on emus?

stargatedalek

Quote from: Sim on January 10, 2015, 02:47:16 PM
Quote from: stargatedalek on January 09, 2015, 11:37:58 PM
the patches of feathers, I'm not sure if you mean the crests or just the random clumps, crests are far from rare amongst modern dinosaurs, and I've spent enough time around emus to say with confidence that the seemingly random clumps are possibly just attempts to show movement in the sculpt
I was referring to the raised feathers on the back of the smaller Therizinosaurus and the back and tail of the deluxe Therizinosaurus, not their crests.  I looked at emu pictures on Google images but the only raised feathers I saw were nowhere near the extent on the 2 Therizinosauruses, or on the front of the emu which I'm guessing was due to wind.  Have you seen raised feather clumps like on the 2 Therizinosauruses in extent and location on emus?
they don't stay that way, but as the bird move the feathers can look like that, actually it goes for any bird (I chose emu as an example from personal experience, but it was hard to find pics of emu moving), in fact I'd even say its more obvious in birds with more complex feathers, but down also illustrates rather well
http://www.allaboutbirds.org/bbimages/aab/images/QOTW-Babybirds2b.png
http://7-themes.com/data_images/out/5/6783876-cute-bird.jpg
http://creativefan.com/files/2010/11/bird-20-500x335.jpg

I attribute those clumps to the sculpt attempting to display movement

Sim


amargasaurus cazaui

Reading some of the information Thomas Holtz as given on Facebook he has made a rather good case for the scaled up upper humerus in this reconstruction to have used a rebbachisaurus femur or bone of some sort. If this proves correct the massive arms will be proven incorrect which does imply the current reconstruction is badly flawed, so buy cautiously
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


suspsy

I've read some of those comments as well, but they don't constitute a proper refutation of the Sereno/Ibrahim findings. A proper paleontological paper would be necessary.
Untitled by suspsy3, on Flickr

amargasaurus cazaui

eh I think when you have  a growing consensus that is endorsed by Paleontologists like Thomas Holz, that the upper arm is actually a sauropod femur , things start come into focus rather quickly. I am sure it is only a matter of time before a proper paper refuting the latest restoration is given, in the meantime do not be surprised if this view does not hold for long.
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


ignite444

I'm not a fan nor supportive of this new position for the Spinosaurus (without irrefutable proof), but I still might buy this model just because hey, it's a Spinosaurus. :P
My Latest Review: Rebor King T-Rex

suspsy

Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on January 14, 2015, 03:51:41 AM
eh I think when you have  a growing consensus that is endorsed by Paleontologists like Thomas Holz, that the upper arm is actually a sauropod femur , things start come into focus rather quickly. I am sure it is only a matter of time before a proper paper refuting the latest restoration is given, in the meantime do not be surprised if this view does not hold for long.

I hear what you're saying, but again, informal comments on a paleontology Facebook page don't necessarily amount to a growing consensus, let alone a formal refutation. I know Tom Holtz, I'm a big fan of his work, but until he or some other paleontologist conducts a proper study of the fossil material, produces a detailed paper, and gives Sereno and Ibrahim a chance to defend their own work, their rendition of Spinosaurus is safe.
Untitled by suspsy3, on Flickr

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: