Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom by Mattel - new for 2019

[Prehistory Resurrection]

Hello all, with some members sharing what they discovered what was new for 2019, for example, Safari Ltd's early reveal of some of their figures, I decided to share what I have discovered too while surfing on the net; for more details on this topic, visit Jurassic Outpost: https://www.jurassicoutpost.com/https://jurassicoutpost.com/watch-mattels-jurassic-world-comic-con-panel-including-first-exciting-look-at-2019-lineup/ and http://www.jptoys.com/index.php/2018/07/22/621-sdcc-2018-huge-reveals-and-we-mean-huge
Mattel had a San Diego Comic Con and as I understood by reading this topic on Jurassic Outpost, some confirmed 2019 dinosaurs and a human figure were being shown and being discussed on.
16 new species of dinosaurs will be released.
The first figure is Franklin Webb.The figure forms part of their 3.75'' line. Hopes for favorites from Jurassic Park such as John Hammond or Henry Wu are high.Other figures revealed from the same line are Owen Grady and a Jurassic Park style Ian Malcolm figure.This is a new collector line.




Now to the dinosaur figures. As I said earlier, Mattel will release 16 new species of dinosaur figures, and the other new figures for 2019 are mainly repaints or different variants and new sculpts of returning dinosaurs of the same 2018 dinosaur figures.




Next is the Blue figure which forms part of the 3.75'' line along with the human figures, once again, this is a new collector line from Mattel.


Now to the real confirmed 2019 figures. These are mainly limited to teases and are silhouettes:

A 3D representation of the new Styracosaurus figure.

A silhouette of the new Action Attack Sized Amargasaurus.(Action Attack Assortment, $20)

The gigantic Brachiosaurus figure.(Price and line unknown)
These figures were in size comparison next to a 3.75'' human figure.

Some sneak peaks of the 2019 figures. If that was not enough, some rumored species that Mattel probably will take into consideration due to fans are Parasaurolophus, Coelurus, Dracorex, Rhamphorynchus, Plesiosaurus, and Indominus Rex.
However, these are not made yet since Mattel's 2018 line. There are hopefully even more to come.See you next time.

[Shadowknight1]

A lot of that has been stated before, but that's the first really nice image of the Amargasaurus silhouette I've seen, and that Styracosaurus looks super intimidating.  Shame the paint will probably let it down.  And that articulated Blue you posed isn't part of the 3.75" line, but a 6" line along with Owen and Ian Malcolm.

[mgaguilar]

Fantastic!
Please keep updating the first post with ongoing news. I can't wait to see what they have in store for this next year! Mattel certainly hit it out of the park with Spinosaurus and their larger figures. Here's to hoping for an Indominus Rex and Bull/male Tyrannosaurus as well!

[Faelrin]

Yeah I really want the Indominus rex and a bull/green/male Tyrannosaurus too. I don't even care if its a repaint of the Extreme Chomping, but it would be great to have some variety since all the rexes so far are the same color scheme. Of course the Parasaurolophus would be great to have too, but at least there's still Kenner's fantastic one. I wonder if the Brachiosaurus will have a similar color palette to the mini figure, though much more detailed for something that big. Sculpts aside, I can't wait to see the color scheme for the Styracosaurus (unless that leaked image is what the final product will be) and Amargasaurus.

Here's a list I put together of the new species we know about (from the leaks, listings, and those confirmed, some rumored from Mattel_Jurassic instragram comments (I had those quoted in the 2018 thread):

   
• Amargasaurus (Confirmed)
• Brachiosaurus (Confirmed)
• Coelurus (Amazon listing)
• Dracorex (Amazon listing)
• Indominus rex (?)
• Parasaurolophus (?)
• Plesiosaurus (Battle Damage Walmart listing, found on brickseek)
• Rhamphorhynchus (Amazon listing)
• Styracosaurus (Confirmed and leaked)
• Tapejara (leaked)
• Therizinosaurus (leaked)

This still leaves 5 more of the 16 species that we don't know about, and I suppose anything could happen between now and then.

[Jose S.M.]

That Styracosaurus looks great in that digital image and the blurry photo. Looks like it could be the best of their ceratopsians, it's legs look better positioned, with more movement.

[ChrisLikesDinos]

Just to chime in, Therizinosaurus was canceled - but it was canned well before the SDCC panel, and does not impact the 16 new species count.

[Flaffy]

Don't know how I feel about the cancellation...
On one hand I would love to see a therizinosaurus in an official JP line.
But on the other... the leaked prototype looks really bad.

[ChrisLikesDinos]

Don't know how I feel about the cancellation...
On one hand I would love to see a therizinosaurus in an official JP line.
But on the other... the leaked prototype looks really bad.

Agreed.

Whatever the reason, I believe it's for the best... that design... is very, very bad, lol.

[stargatedalek]

I don't think it's that bad. Actually I would say the body is quite good, and the head is quite good, it's just they absolutely do not match that is the issue with it. It would benefit hugely from some fairly minor retooling.

[Faelrin]

If I had to guess the claws were just deemed unsafe for kids, maybe the poor reception to its head's design had something to do with it as well. Although Papo has their new Therizinosaurus, but the claws on that one are shorter then they should be. Well in any case that opens up the slot for something else. There's still several we don't know about, and aside from a few of these, we don't know what most of them look like. That's not even counting potential repaints that will show up either that we don't know about (beyond the Dimetrodon and Monolophosaurus).

[Faelrin]

I just saw some listings on amazon Canada from elsewhere. Looks like we'll be getting a Nasutoceratops, Concavenator, and new Allosaurus and Triceratops. Part of a Dual Attack line.

Triceratops:
https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B07HR8S52J/

Allosaurus:
https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B07HQZZ2TF/

Concavenator:
https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B07HR99GB4/

Nasutoceratops:
https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B07HQYKPT7

I'm mostly intrigued about the Concavenator obviously. It being one of the Lockwood diorama species after all. Of course the fact that the Allosaurus and Triceratops also does, since they sound like the will be new sculpts, even if retools. Nasutoceratops is a cool species selection too.

[Loon]

From the bios they seem to be the new Roarivores. I doubt they'll be retools, we've seen what Mattel has done, and they seem like they'd prefer to do new sculpts over retools. Hopefully the Allosaurus looks more like the movie. Also, I'm loving the fact that the ceratopsians are getting more love, that Nasutoceratops is getting me hyped.

[Brocc21]

Neat.

[Faelrin]

"These smaller-size action-scale dinosaur figures have two-button activation for both tail strike action and head strike action." The roarivores don't have that kind of gimmick, which is why I think they will be retools.

[MLMjp]

I wish that one of these listings confirmed some of the rumored/hinted/leaked dinosaurs like Parasaurolophus.

[Flaffy]

Interesting. Wasn't expecting any large ceratopsids outside of the ones that are already announced/released.
Now I really hope that there'll be an actual movie accurate Sinoceratops.
Wasn't expecting another Allosaurus either. Mattel better get this one right, and not give it a rat tail or a boxy head with genetic teeth defects.
The concavenator shouldn't be that hard to mess up... I hope... nice to see Mattel bringing lesser known dinosaurs into the public eye, and hopefully not misrepresent and confuse one dinosaur with another.

[Faelrin]

@Flaffy The concept art of the "Sinoceratops" in the film was revealed. It still resembled the creature we saw in the film, but they were clearly trying to pass it off as a Pachyrhinosaurus for one reason or another (someone obviously didn't do their research). Mattel at least did their research with this genus. It would also explain why there are still some references to it being called a Pachyrhinosaurus (such as the mini figure, Walmart listing, etc). It might explain why the DPG list did not have Sinoceratops on it to start with (although shortly afterwards it did). I have to wonder if they changed the name due to all the fan complaints and speculation on social media that had gone on since the trailer was revealed, which then would have carried over into other marketing aspects (such as the toy's name). Honestly this whole mess probably could have been avoided if whoever designed the creature for the film, just got it right from the get go (not that I'm against Sinoceratops being in the film, or there being a toy of it, etc).

Edit: It's possible there was creative license taken to the extreme too. Upon closer examination of it, it has some features of the Pachyrhinosaurus upon the head, but still has way too much wrong with it (such as the nose horn). It only superficially resembles a Sinoceratops. Whatever the case, it makes the frilled spitting Dilophosaurus seem rather tame in comparison.

In any case though, since the creature in the film has since been renamed, it would be interesting to see their take on something that resembles it more down the road.

[tanystropheus]

The concavenator shouldn't be that hard to mess up... I hope... nice to see Mattel bringing lesser known dinosaurs into the public eye, and hopefully not misrepresent and confuse one dinosaur with another.

What if they put a triangular sail on top of their Monolophosaurus and call it a day...?

[Brontozaurus]

@Flaffy The concept art of the "Sinoceratops" in the film was revealed. It still resembled the creature we saw in the film, but they were clearly trying to pass it off as a Pachyrhinosaurus for one reason or another (someone obviously didn't do their research). Mattel at least did their research with this genus. It would also explain why there are still some references to it being called a Pachyrhinosaurus (such as the mini figure, Walmart listing, etc). It might explain why the DPG list did not have Sinoceratops on it to start with (although shortly afterwards it did). I have to wonder if they changed the name due to all the fan complaints and speculation on social media that had gone on since the trailer was revealed, which then would have carried over into other marketing aspects (such as the toy's name). Honestly this whole mess probably could have been avoided if whoever designed the creature for the film, just got it right from the get go (not that I'm against Sinoceratops being in the film, or there being a toy of it, etc).

Edit: It's possible there was creative license taken to the extreme too. Upon closer examination of it, it has some features of the Pachyrhinosaurus upon the head, but still has way too much wrong with it (such as the nose horn). It only superficially resembles a Sinoceratops. Whatever the case, it makes the frilled spitting Dilophosaurus seem rather tame in comparison.

In any case though, since the creature in the film has since been renamed, it would be interesting to see their take on something that resembles it more down the road.

Since there's references in the film to Sinoceratops (one of the vials at the end is labelled as such), I feel like the switch from Pachyrhinosaurus happened during production, but not in time for some merchandise to catch up. It'd be interesting to find out why; Jurassic World doesn't care about accuracy at all, so that probably isn't it.

[ChrisLikesDinos]

I believe the 'Dual Attack' SKU are essentially Roarivores without electronics. The Concave and Nasuto should be new sculpts, and a decent size.

I'm betting the Allo and Trike will be retools of their previous release, with new color schemes.

@Flaffy The concept art of the "Sinoceratops" in the film was revealed. It still resembled the creature we saw in the film, but they were clearly trying to pass it off as a Pachyrhinosaurus for one reason or another (someone obviously didn't do their research). Mattel at least did their research with this genus. It would also explain why there are still some references to it being called a Pachyrhinosaurus (such as the mini figure, Walmart listing, etc). It might explain why the DPG list did not have Sinoceratops on it to start with (although shortly afterwards it did). I have to wonder if they changed the name due to all the fan complaints and speculation on social media that had gone on since the trailer was revealed, which then would have carried over into other marketing aspects (such as the toy's name). Honestly this whole mess probably could have been avoided if whoever designed the creature for the film, just got it right from the get go (not that I'm against Sinoceratops being in the film, or there being a toy of it, etc).

Edit: It's possible there was creative license taken to the extreme too. Upon closer examination of it, it has some features of the Pachyrhinosaurus upon the head, but still has way too much wrong with it (such as the nose horn). It only superficially resembles a Sinoceratops. Whatever the case, it makes the frilled spitting Dilophosaurus seem rather tame in comparison.

In any case though, since the creature in the film has since been renamed, it would be interesting to see their take on something that resembles it more down the road.

Since there's references in the film to Sinoceratops (one of the vials at the end is labelled as such), I feel like the switch from Pachyrhinosaurus happened during production, but not in time for some merchandise to catch up. It'd be interesting to find out why; Jurassic World doesn't care about accuracy at all, so that probably isn't it.

The switch happened late December 2017, after the trailer hit. The only thing that changed was the name, the dinosaur design remained the same as it was when called Pachyrhinosaurus.

As an aside, when Jama Jurbaev uploaded his art files, the Sino/Pachy files were still labeled Pachyrhinosaurus: https://cdna.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/013/083/996/large/jama-jurabaev-pachy.jpg?1537974419
https://cdna.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/013/083/988/large/jama-jurabaev-af-pachyrhinosaurus-v0003-115.jpg?1537974398



Another name change via CG was the large Ceratopsian skull

https://twitter.com/ChrisLikesDinos/status/1042899788218417162