You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_Renecito

RECUR - New for 2024

Started by Renecito, January 30, 2024, 07:56:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

stargatedalek

Quote from: crazy8wizard on September 28, 2024, 06:05:58 PMWell regardless of it being a carnivore/omnivore it doesn't seem all that reasonable to base the head of therizinosaurus off deinocheirus. Therizinosaurs are maniraptorans and are much more derived than ornithomimosaurs, so that would be like putting a tapejarid head on an azhdarchid; related and reasonably close, but definitely wrong.
Not to mention that other therizinosaurs skulls exist and are quite different from deinocheirus.
Do we have gut content from Therizinosaurus to prove it wasn't an omnivore? Regardless, Deinocheirus and Therizinosaurus cohabited the same areas, and so were likely feeding on the same plants in a similar way. Would it most likely have been this similar? No, but the idea that it's skull would (more broadly) resemble those of herbivores that feed on aquatic plants is a perfectly reasonable reconstruction.

We know from strength studies that Therizinosaurus claws were not functional for feeding, unlike those of other Therizinosaurs. So it was eating primarily using its skull, not its forelimbs, therefore the skull would not realistically be all that similar to the skulls of the forelimb feeding species. Let alone much smaller ones.


Sim

Firstly, we have no evidence that Deinocheirus ate plants, as far as I'm aware.  Secondly, therizinosaurids lack features for feeding on aquatic plants e.g. by being more upright than other theropods.  There is nothing to suggest Therizinosaurus fed on aquatic plants rather than on the trees and other plants that were widespread in its environment.  Its claws being unable to pull food towards it doesn't stop Therizinosaurus from simply feeding on trees and other plants with just its head.

crazy8wizard

Quote from: Sim on September 28, 2024, 08:20:37 PMFirstly, we have no evidence that Deinocheirus ate plants, as far as I'm aware.

None directly, but the skull shape and a paper using finite element analysis suggests that it would have likely eaten softer foods, so the aquatic plant hypothesis comes from that. It isn't as set in stone as gut contents, but without any teeth to study, that's the best we may get.

crazy8wizard

Also I recall seeing a hypothesis that Therizinosaurus might not be bringing food to its mouth from its hands, but using the giant claws and hands to pull food towards the mouth and using the neck and mouth to feed, somewhat like a sauropod. Try to imagine pulling a bar towards you by just flexing your elbows.

thomasw100

I would argue that Therizionosaurus and Dinocheirus have been placed into two very different clades based on a considerable number of skeletal characters which are quite distinct. If we look at the differences and similarities of skulls of dinosaurs of other clades in general, they tend to be comparatively similar for genera within a clade. So it would be not reasonable to assume that a Therizinosaurus would have had a Deinocheirus like head.

crazy8wizard

Quote from: thomasw100 on September 28, 2024, 08:33:01 PMI would argue that Therizionosaurus and Dinocheirus have been placed into two very different clades based on a considerable number of skeletal characters which are quite distinct. If we look at the differences and similarities of skulls of dinosaurs of other clades in general, they tend to be comparatively similar for genera within a clade. So it would be not reasonable to assume that a Therizinosaurus would have had a Deinocheirus like head.

Not to mention how really distinct skeletal features like this usually come from niche partitioning. Pretty dissimilar aside from really big coelurosaurs with huge arms.

stargatedalek

Quote from: Sim on September 28, 2024, 08:20:37 PMFirstly, we have no evidence that Deinocheirus ate plants, as far as I'm aware.  Secondly, therizinosaurids lack features for feeding on aquatic plants e.g. by being more upright than other theropods.  There is nothing to suggest Therizinosaurus fed on aquatic plants rather than on the trees and other plants that were widespread in its environment.  Its claws being unable to pull food towards it doesn't stop Therizinosaurus from simply feeding on trees and other plants with just its head.
Fair enough, though I still posit that the skull would likely not resemble the smaller, hand feeding relatives particularly closely regardless or whether or not it resembled Deinocheirus. If for example it resembled those of large browsing hadrosaurs, it would still look more like Deinocheirus than the typical Segnosaurus/Erlikosaurus based skulls Therizinosaurus is often given.

As for whether Deinocheirus ate plants, if it didn't, than it's beak coincidentally resembled a shape common for herbivores. Thus they may have coincidentally looked similar anyway.

Amazon ad:

Sim

I was just thinking now that in terms of ecology, Therizinosaurus was probably more like the contemporary Saurolophus than Deinocheirus...

Faelrin

I think the current consensus for Deinocheirus is that it was an omnivore based on the evidence and understanding of it at hand (a mix of an herbivore and a piscivore). Its stomach preserved over 1000 gastroliths alongside fish remains (2014 paper is paywalled so I'm not sure what extant the material is, other then wikipedia saying it consists of scales and vertebrae).

Both the 2014 paper with the description of the new material, a 2017 paper (paywalled), and a 2019 paper alludes to it having features of an herbivore. A 2022 paper further supports Deinocheirus being an omnivore.
Film Accurate Mattel JW and JP toys list (incl. extended canon species, etc):
http://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=6702

Every Single Mainline Mattel Jurassic World Species A-Z; 2025 toys added!:
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9974.0

Most produced Paleozoic genera (visual encyclopedia):
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9144.0

Halichoeres

avatar_Nyr0r0saurus @Nyrorosaurus your image link isn't working anymore.
In the kingdom of the blind, better take public transit. Well, in the kingdom of the sighted, too, really--almost everyone is a terrible driver.

My attempt to find the best toy of every species

My trade/sale/wishlist thread

Sometimes I draw pictures

Nyr0r0saurus


Samrukia

Sinoceratops & Cryolophosaurus

from Paleofiguras








Carnoking

Hold up, did RECUR just outdo everyone with these?


Faelrin

Wow these both look incredible. Need the Cryolophosaurus for sure. Lips, feathers, and some blue (even though a paleomeme).
Film Accurate Mattel JW and JP toys list (incl. extended canon species, etc):
http://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=6702

Every Single Mainline Mattel Jurassic World Species A-Z; 2025 toys added!:
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9974.0

Most produced Paleozoic genera (visual encyclopedia):
https://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=9144.0

SenSx

The Cryo looks fantastic, do we know the scale ?

Pinbacker

I will instantly order both of those if they are true 1:35 scale...that Cryolophosaurus is magnificent

DefinitelyNOTDilo

Quote from: Pinbacker on October 16, 2024, 04:15:36 PMI will instantly order both of those if they are true 1:35 scale...that Cryolophosaurus is magnificent

I feel the exact same about cryo, I've been wanting one for ages and this one looks amazing!

Primeval12

I am blown away by these two. Both are going to be instant buys for me.

Samrukia

for understanding the sizes


Flaffy

Definitely contenders for the best representations of Sinoceratops and Cryolophosaurus on the market. Can't wait to see more of these two.

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: