You can support the Dinosaur Toy Forum by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: these and other links to Ebay.com and Amazon.com on the Dinosaur Toy Forum are often affiliate links, so when you make purchases through them we may make a commission.

avatar_suspsy

Safari Ltd Will Be Releasing Six New Dinosaurs In 2016

Started by suspsy, September 01, 2015, 01:23:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

suspsy

Untitled by suspsy3, on Flickr


CityRaptor

Oh yeah! And it would also fit as a chinese Dinosaur.
Jurassic Park is frightning in the dark
All the dinosaurs are running wild
Someone let T. Rex out of his pen
I'm afraid those things'll harm me
'Cause they sure don't act like Barney
And they think that I'm their dinner, not their friend
Oh no

Dinoguy2

Quote from: suspsy on September 09, 2015, 01:29:15 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on September 09, 2015, 03:51:32 AM
Does not seem like a lot of remains to work with...


The remains consisted of the holotype IVPP V.4006, a skull-less fragmentary skeleton, and the paratype IVPP V4007,[3] three vertebrae from the tail of a second individual.[4]
A smaller species from the Ejinhoro Formation in the Ordos Basin in Inner Mongolia, W. ordosensis, was formalized by the same researcher in 1993. It is based on specimen IVPP V6877, a fragmentary skeleton lacking the skull. It was found in 1988.[5] A third species, W. mongoliensis, is based on dorsal and caudal vertebrae as well as a pair of pubes.[6][7]

Dacentrurus is also known from very scant remains, but that didn't stop Dan LoRusso from making a very well-received toy.

And now it turns out Dacentrurus may be the same animal as Miragaia, so...
The Carnegie Collection Dinosaur Archive - http://www.dinosaurmountain.net

Gwangi

Quote from: suspsy on September 09, 2015, 01:29:15 PM
Quote from: amargasaurus cazaui on September 09, 2015, 03:51:32 AM
Does not seem like a lot of remains to work with...


The remains consisted of the holotype IVPP V.4006, a skull-less fragmentary skeleton, and the paratype IVPP V4007,[3] three vertebrae from the tail of a second individual.[4]
A smaller species from the Ejinhoro Formation in the Ordos Basin in Inner Mongolia, W. ordosensis, was formalized by the same researcher in 1993. It is based on specimen IVPP V6877, a fragmentary skeleton lacking the skull. It was found in 1988.[5] A third species, W. mongoliensis, is based on dorsal and caudal vertebrae as well as a pair of pubes.[6][7]

Dacentrurus is also known from very scant remains, but that didn't stop Dan LoRusso from making a very well-received toy.

CollectA made a really nice one too, still need to get it actually.

amargasaurus cazaui

I keep thinking to myself if I were Doug, and I had just sculpted that stunning Sauropelta and were looking around for something similar to follow  it up that Gargoyleosaurs would be a logical and superb choice...it is a unique dinosaur, has a decent set of remains and is another K. Carpenter mount.
   Sadly I wish the same case could be made for Aquilops with its tiny bit of cranial material and nothing more.
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen


Takama

I would be happy with any other Thyreophorian(may of Spelled it wrong) Dinosaur be it a Stegosaur, or Ankylosaur.

suspsy

#86
Gargoyleosaurus is indeed a beautiful animal, but as a nodosaurid, it's very similar in appearance to Sauropelta. At least to lay people it is. I'd be surprised if Safari opted to release two nodosaurids in two years. If there is a thyreophoran among the 2016 six, I think it'll be either a stegosaurid (fingers crossed) or an ankylosaurid. Pinacosaurus and Tarchia would be prime candidates. Not to mention Ankylosaurus itself.

Time will tell!
Untitled by suspsy3, on Flickr

Amazon ad:

Stuckasaurus (Dino Dad Reviews)

Quote from: Dinoguy2 on September 10, 2015, 12:07:58 AM
And now it turns out Dacentrurus may be the same animal as Miragaia, so...

Really? That's cool. When did they find that out?

Yutyrannus

Well, it would be nice to see a Scelidosaurus figure :).

"The world's still the same. There's just less in it."

suspsy

Quote from: Stuckasaurus on September 11, 2015, 06:24:52 AM
Quote from: Dinoguy2 on September 10, 2015, 12:07:58 AM
And now it turns out Dacentrurus may be the same animal as Miragaia, so...

Really? That's cool. When did they find that out?

They didn't "find that out." It's a proposal by one group of paleontologists, but it's only speculation at this point.
Untitled by suspsy3, on Flickr

Stuckasaurus (Dino Dad Reviews)

Quote from: suspsy on September 11, 2015, 01:20:22 PM
Quote from: Stuckasaurus on September 11, 2015, 06:24:52 AM
Quote from: Dinoguy2 on September 10, 2015, 12:07:58 AM
And now it turns out Dacentrurus may be the same animal as Miragaia, so...

Really? That's cool. When did they find that out?

They didn't "find that out." It's a proposal by one group of paleontologists, but it's only speculation at this point.

So no actual paper on the topic, then?

Dinoguy2

#91
Quote from: Stuckasaurus on September 11, 2015, 07:50:05 PM
Quote from: suspsy on September 11, 2015, 01:20:22 PM
Quote from: Stuckasaurus on September 11, 2015, 06:24:52 AM
Quote from: Dinoguy2 on September 10, 2015, 12:07:58 AM
And now it turns out Dacentrurus may be the same animal as Miragaia, so...

Really? That's cool. When did they find that out?

They didn't "find that out." It's a proposal by one group of paleontologists, but it's only speculation at this point.

So no actual paper on the topic, then?

There is a paper, have to dig up the reference. Basically they argue that the two are from the same time period and the diagnostic features of both aren't in any overlapping material (eg the distinctive long neck in M., while the neck isn't known completely in D., etc.) and all the bones that we do have from both specimens are identical. So there's no objective reason to say they are distinct (this seems like it will just end up making Dacentrurus into a nomen dubium since it can't be distinguished from better specimens of other species).

That's a lot more than just speculation, not proof of course but somebody will need to study the bones closely if they hope to counter argue the case.
The Carnegie Collection Dinosaur Archive - http://www.dinosaurmountain.net

amargasaurus cazaui

I was thinking this same, that I had read the paper as well . It seemed to me it was pretty well stated, and  left the burden fairly heavily on finding anything diagnostic to seperate the two.
  If anything, according to what I remember reading the speculative would seem more arguing they should be seperate.
Authors with varying competence have suggested dinosaurs disappeared because of meteorites...God's will, raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of standing room in Noah's Ark, and palaeoweltschmerz—Glenn Jepsen



Dinoguy2

#93
This is the paper that suggests synonymizing Dacentrurus and Miragaia:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018210003111

Anf here's an updated skeletal showing Dacentrurus with missing parts filled in based on Miragaia reflecting its status as sister species or synonym, apparently approved by Galton:
http://sanderkools.deviantart.com/art/Dacentrurus-armatus-328393287

And here's a skeletal (top) showing what's known from just Dacentrurus.
The Carnegie Collection Dinosaur Archive - http://www.dinosaurmountain.net

Concavenator

Based on what a Safari admin said on Instagram a while ago,I would expect the news to be revealed sometime this week.At least I hope so!  ;)

Paleona

Thanks for the heads up; that's really exciting if it ends up being true! :) 
(Curious as to what the admin said, though?  I can't seem to find it.)

Concavenator


tanystropheus

Quote from: sauroid on September 08, 2015, 08:22:54 AM
well they can make a Titanoboa that looks like this

that looks like a cross between an East African sand boa and a Synbranchid eel (now that looks ancient and weird enough) swallowing a caiman-like prehistoric crocodilian.

I just realized how tiny the Titanboa really is. It's 40 feet long. Largest Anacondas are about 28 feet in length. Cryptid Anacondas are believed to be around 60 feet +. Titanboa is overrated  :D

sauroid

indeed, but i guess the sheer bulk of it would still be overwhelming and scary as **** if you see it face to face. ^_^
"you know you have a lot of prehistoric figures if you have at least twenty items per page of the prehistoric/dinosaur section on ebay." - anon.

Concavenator

I'm getting a little bit impatient   :P Please Safari reveal the photos!

Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon are affiliate links, so the DinoToyForum may make a commission if you click them.


Amazon ad: