This has been a good year for fans of the early Cretaceous allosauroid, Acrocanthosaurus. Battat re-released their classic model, Rebor is getting in on the action with their own representation and CollectA has come out with their deluxe version of the theropod. Critics of the CollectA model point out that it looks awfully similar to last year’s Carcharadontosaurus. I suppose that may be true, but being as closely related as the two genera are I can’t criticize the similarity too much. Since I was the one to review the Carcharadontosaurus last year I suppose that should make reviewing this model that much easier right?
Well yes, as it turns out the Deluxe Acrocanthosaurus is remarkably similar to her bigger brother. The proportions and posture are nearly identical. For anyone who hated the Carcharodontosaurus for its wide hips, shrink wrapped skull or large toe nails you can probably stop reading this right now. But personally, I’m a big fan of that Carcharodontosaurus. And I know I’m not alone, it placed #1 in the “Best New Dinosaurs of 2014” poll on the Dinosaur Toy Forum. Rest assured that although the Acrocanthosaurus carries many of the same flaws, it also has many of the same positive attributes that we loved about last year’s model.
The head sculpt is particularly noteworthy with the characteristically narrow, shallow and elongated skull of Acrocanthosaurus. Although some will bemoan the obvious antorbital fenestra, it is in keeping with the large fenestra that Acrocanthosaurus actually had. That said; all the skull openings are quite obvious. The tall neural spines start off as a hump on the neck and gives way to a thin sail down the back with each individual spine emphasized. The portion of the sail directly above the hips is the exception here, like Acrocanthosaurus itself the spines in this area were narrowly spaced apart and the sculpture shows it. Personally, I would have preferred the sail be more hump-like but that’s just my preference. The arms appear small yet robust but the hands really are spindly little things and lack the large claw on the innermost digit. The legs are muscular and bird-like and the tail appears appropriately lengthy and beefy where it meets those enormous hips. It’s been said that CollectA widens the hips to help the stability of their models. This might be true but due to a softer material used in this sculpt the legs seem to have some warping issues. Mine is not very stable and easily falls over. The material used is soft and more like something Bullyland or Schleich would use.
Aesthetically this is a very organic looking, finely detailed model. Once again we draw attention to the magnificent head where tiny scales are sculpted around the fenestrae, each tooth is individually sculpted and painted at various sizes and small hornlets are present above the eyes. The mouth is also articulated on this model, among the first CollectA models to have this feature. Although it does not shut completely or function as well as those on Papo models it is nice to have the option for a closed mouth on a theropod. Inside the mouth is a pink tongue lifting up off the jaw in a very reptilian fashion.
The overall model is dynamic in sculpt, the animal striding forward with her head lifted up as if bellowing to an intruder, mate or perhaps nestlings. The tiny black eyes tucked into the skull and under the ridged eyebrows give her an aged, intelligent, almost peaceful appearance. The neck is muscular and strong with fleshy folds along the underside. The rest of the sculpt is highly detailed with osteoderms along the flanks, small scutes along the spine, bird-like scales along the toes and crocodilian-like belly scales. The only off putting detail that bears mentioning is the obvious attachment point where the head meets the model. Aside from that, this is an imposing and life-like piece.
The body is painted in various shades of brown with a creamy colored tail and underside. The sail is green with orange scutes along the top, down the tail and towards the snout. The green sail gives way to green bars along the sides and down the tail. Overall this is a very pleasing color scheme and pattern. It is natural looking, both soft and eye catching. The paint application is mostly clean but the orange scutes along the back bleed onto the sail in quite a few places.
If you didn’t like last year’s Charcharadontosaurus then you probably should skip on this model as well. If like me you’re a fan of that model you should find a lot of love here too. In fact, the two pair quite well together! Among the Acro models in this price range it is certainly the most life-like and detailed. This model is just now hitting the shelves so you should have no issue finding it either out in the wild or through your favorite online vendor.
[…] ever made, and I assume it was created to compete with versions of this dinosaur by the likes of CollectA, Rebor, and the recently released Papo model. However, one glance at the model should be enough to […]
[…] is my favorite Acrocanthosaurus and definitely the better of the two models offered in 2015 with CollectA having the other. It’s just my opinion, but I think that Hercules is probably the best […]
[…] I’m also very happy to report that this model does not have the overly wide hips plaguing the Acrocanthosaurus and last year’s […]
The main thing that bugs me about this and the Carcharodontosaurus skulpts are the shoulders. They just look like big fat rolls with little arms sticking out. No subtlety to it at all just looks weird.
I was so looking forward to the release of this figure until the surprise rerelease of the Battat Acrocanthosaurus, which seems to make this one as well as most of the others largely redundant.
Meh, just get both! The Battat has the accuracy, the CollectA has the detail. You can’t have too many Acros!
I like the Collecta Charcharodontosaurus well enough, fenestrae aside, and I would like this as well, except the spine is too spiny. I’m used to seeing Acrocanthosaurus portrayed with a thicker ridge like in the Battat version.
I’m not advocating a hump though, since I appreciate that ridge for making the creature look distinctive. I’m not as big a fan of Safari’s, for example: it’s ridge is buried in enough tissue that you can hardly tell it’s there, and it just kinda becomes a generic megalosaur.
I simply feel that Collecta’s just kinda looks almost pasted on, like a lizard portraying a “dinosaur” in a 1960’s B movie.
I actually did have a line in my review that basically said the same thing, that the sail looked like it was tacked on as an afterthought. I edited it out and just left the part where I stated I would have preferred a hump instead.
My problem with CollectA’s Acro’s spine is that it’s not done enough. The tall vertebrae should start at the neck. I do like the Safari’s Acro, but it’s helped a lot by the coloration. I’m really looking forward to Rebor’s though.
Oy with the visible fenestrae again 🙁 Other than that, the face is quite nice. Very precise sculpting on the teeth and tongue; and I like the eyes.
As for texture Acrocanthosaurus in my case it tends to be sticky plastic (the same goes for me to deluxe Collecta Agustinia). Can it be due to dust or a wet environment?
As for the figure from my humble point of view it is perhaps the weakest figure of Collecta 2015. Moreover Gwangi commentary is quite good and scientist is appreciated.
I’m really quite fond of this sculpt. I will, however, maintain to my dying breath that it’s a repaint of the Carcharodontosaurus figure with an articulate jaw thrown in. It’s interesting that you mentioned you had problems getting it to stand. I have that same problem with the Carcharo.
Are you aware that CollectA themselves have denied that it is not a repaint or even a reused mold?
Anyway I really like the face sculpt on this one. Negatives for me are the elongated toes and claws which look odd.
Oh I know they have. I still have my suspicions. The similarities are too striking IMO.