Safari: New for 2017

[Sim]

I feel the ornamental keratin/scales on the top of Giganotosaurus's head were done much better on the Carnegie Collection version.  On the Wild Safari version they extend far around fenestrae, which is the same problem I see in a number of the 2017 prehistoric Papo figures.  In the end though, it's not much of a problem to me as I'm not interested in having a figure that's permanently attached to a base.

[Killekor]

I don't like permanent bases too, but i Will get it.

Any pics of the psittacosaurus?

Killekor

[tanystropheus]

I feel the ornamental keratin/scales on the top of Giganotosaurus's head were done much better on the Carnegie Collection version.  On the Wild Safari version they extend far around fenestrae, which is the same problem I see in a number of the 2017 prehistoric Papo figures.  In the end though, it's not much of a problem to me as I'm not interested in having a figure that's permanently attached to a base.

At least the base is pleasant to look at. CollectA bases are borderline insulting. They are treated like an afterthought with zero regard for the level of contrast between the base and the model.

[Takama]

I feel the ornamental keratin/scales on the top of Giganotosaurus's head were done much better on the Carnegie Collection version.  On the Wild Safari version they extend far around fenestrae, which is the same problem I see in a number of the 2017 prehistoric Papo figures.  In the end though, it's not much of a problem to me as I'm not interested in having a figure that's permanently attached to a base.

At least the base is pleasant to look at. CollectA bases are borderline insulting. They are treated like an afterthought with zero regard for the level of contrast between the base and the model.

Whats Wrong with bases being treated as an AFTER THOGHT?    The main focus should be the Animal .

[tanystropheus]

I feel the ornamental keratin/scales on the top of Giganotosaurus's head were done much better on the Carnegie Collection version.  On the Wild Safari version they extend far around fenestrae, which is the same problem I see in a number of the 2017 prehistoric Papo figures.  In the end though, it's not much of a problem to me as I'm not interested in having a figure that's permanently attached to a base.

At least the base is pleasant to look at. CollectA bases are borderline insulting. They are treated like an afterthought with zero regard for the level of contrast between the base and the model.

Whats Wrong with bases being treated as an AFTER THOGHT?    The main focus should be the Animal .

If you are into showcasing your pieces, a subpar base makes the animal look tacky and ruins the overall presentation.

[suspsy]

I feel the ornamental keratin/scales on the top of Giganotosaurus's head were done much better on the Carnegie Collection version.  On the Wild Safari version they extend far around fenestrae, which is the same problem I see in a number of the 2017 prehistoric Papo figures.  In the end though, it's not much of a problem to me as I'm not interested in having a figure that's permanently attached to a base.

At least the base is pleasant to look at. CollectA bases are borderline insulting. They are treated like an afterthought with zero regard for the level of contrast between the base and the model.

Whats Wrong with bases being treated as an AFTER THOGHT?    The main focus should be the Animal .

If you are into showcasing your pieces, a subpar base makes the animal look tacky and ruins the overall presentation.

"Borderline insulting"? Seriously? You think plastic bases for toy dinosaurs are "borderline insulting" just because they're not done to your personal liking?

That is very sad.

[tanystropheus]

I feel the ornamental keratin/scales on the top of Giganotosaurus's head were done much better on the Carnegie Collection version.  On the Wild Safari version they extend far around fenestrae, which is the same problem I see in a number of the 2017 prehistoric Papo figures.  In the end though, it's not much of a problem to me as I'm not interested in having a figure that's permanently attached to a base.

At least the base is pleasant to look at. CollectA bases are borderline insulting. They are treated like an afterthought with zero regard for the level of contrast between the base and the model.

Whats Wrong with bases being treated as an AFTER THOGHT?    The main focus should be the Animal .

If you are into showcasing your pieces, a subpar base makes the animal look tacky and ruins the overall presentation.

"Borderline insulting"? Seriously? You think plastic bases for toy dinosaurs are "borderline insulting" just because they're not done to your personal liking?

That is very sad.

It is "borderline insulting" for the animal on the base.  It is very sad indeed. I feel sorry for the inanimate dinosaur representation that will forever be adhered to a base that is not of its ilk. 

[Simon]

Folks, there is a very, very VERY easy "fix" for these Theropod bases;

(but first off let me say that I think that bases are 100% preferable to figures that fall over - after all we buy them to display them, not to play with them)

The way you "neutralize" bases that don't seem to "fit" with the figure is to REPAINT the base (not the figure) a neutral color that will blend in with the display area.

Example:  That fine, FINE looking Safari Giganotosaurus has a base that is light colored, just like the figure.  That is an example, to me, of poor color choices.  However, one does not need much artistic talent (perhaps a small brush and steady hand) to paint the base around the animal's feet a darker color - example: if you are going to display it on a wood shelf, paint the base the same color as the shelf.

The figure will thus stand out from its surroundings, AND have the added benefit of still NOT falling over.

Problem solved.   

[Neosodon]

(but first off let me say that I think that bases are 100% preferable to figures that fall over - after all we buy them to display them, not to play with them)

I'm not sure about everyone else but I still play with mine. But I still prefer a correctly positioned therapod on a base over a tripod or one that is constantly falling down.

[stargatedalek]

It is "borderline insulting" for the animal on the base.  It is very sad indeed. I feel sorry for the inanimate dinosaur representation that will forever be adhered to a base that is not of its ilk.

Indeed! If a base is done very well, has lots of nice detail work, and suits the figure, I may be willing to overlook permanent adherement. It's a sad feeling seeing beautiful CollectA sculpts permanently affixed to the blandest, crudest, most unbefitting bases imaginable. Of course, if a abse is plain enough, such as a flat disc, and is done very subtly, that can also work well.

[Neosodon]

It is "borderline insulting" for the animal on the base.  It is very sad indeed. I feel sorry for the inanimate dinosaur representation that will forever be adhered to a base that is not of its ilk.

Indeed! If a base is done very well, has lots of nice detail work, and suits the figure, I may be willing to overlook permanent adherement. It's a sad feeling seeing beautiful CollectA sculpts permanently affixed to the blandest, crudest, most unbefitting bases imaginable. Of course, if a abse is plain enough, such as a flat disc, and is done very subtly, that can also work well.

I made a base for Collecta Rajasaurus by super gluing a square piece of clear plastic to the bottom of its feet. It is almost invisible and is very durable.

[Blade-of-the-Moon]

If anyone needs a base " plus-ed"  I and several other artists here can help with that. From painting to adding moss, wood, ect.. it's what we do, hire us! lol

My "Best toy T. Rexes" shelf  has a new member :



whew, think i'm done with the comparison pics now.

[Daspletotyrannus]

That Giganotosaurus is looking good. I think I might get one.

[Sim]

Blade, in your most recent photos it looks like a base wasn't enough to keep the baby CollectA Tyrannosaurus standing?

[Blade-of-the-Moon]

Blade, in your most recent photos it looks like a base wasn't enough to keep the baby CollectA Tyrannosaurus standing?

I had seen him leaning a bit and had chucked the plastic so made a little floral wire prop. the  legs are just too thin and soft to hold it up i think. but if they were harder it would be prone to breakage..so not a great solution to be had.

[Jetdin]

all the releases look beautiful!
but i specifically love the giganotosaurus ! this looks so accurate and very anatomically correct..
will most probably get it with the t rex too. the trex looks nice and bulky

[suspsy]

It is "borderline insulting" for the animal on the base.  It is very sad indeed. I feel sorry for the inanimate dinosaur representation that will forever be adhered to a base that is not of its ilk.

I'm very grateful that I don't share such standards. The day I gripe more about the base than the actual figure mounted on it is the day I ditch my hobby entirely.

[Rain]

It is "borderline insulting" for the animal on the base.  It is very sad indeed. I feel sorry for the inanimate dinosaur representation that will forever be adhered to a base that is not of its ilk.

Indeed! If a base is done very well, has lots of nice detail work, and suits the figure, I may be willing to overlook permanent adherement. It's a sad feeling seeing beautiful CollectA sculpts permanently affixed to the blandest, crudest, most unbefitting bases imaginable. Of course, if a abse is plain enough, such as a flat disc, and is done very subtly, that can also work well.

Agreed. A poorly done, permanent, base detracts from the figure.

[Jose S.M.]

I don't think it's insulting or that much horrible, but I do wish CollectA bases were better, at least give it some dirt like colors or something that makes them look more natural, right know they look very artificial.

[tanystropheus]

It is "borderline insulting" for the animal on the base.  It is very sad indeed. I feel sorry for the inanimate dinosaur representation that will forever be adhered to a base that is not of its ilk.

I'm very grateful that I don't share such standards. The day I gripe more about the base than the actual figure mounted on it is the day I ditch my hobby entirely.

I'm sure that there are a fair number of hobbyists that feel the same way (regarding CollectA's subpar bases). There are only so many models that I can purchase. I look at the whole presentation.