Eofauna general discussion

[tanystropheus]

Another slice. Another clue!

[Andreioli]

ED says two models in the autumn, see Facebook post.
Also their slice is different.

[Ravonium]

Me personally, this looks even more like Atlasaurus than the other slice (which I do still think is Atlasaurus)

[Shonisaurus]

I sincerely hope that it is an atlasaurus I like it more than Eofauna focuses on obscure figures in the market of collectibles and toys. There are prehistoric animals that are not in production in PVC, vinyl or resin that children and collectors would like equally. They do not always have to be tyrannosaurus, triceratops, brachiosaurus, mammoth, dimetrodon, smilodon or parasaurolophus to give several examples. There is a metaphorically speaking infinity of species that should be treated or that are poorly treated as the muttaburrasaurus that I only know of Invicta and Animals of Australia.

I cross my fingers to make it an atlasaurus.

[Takama]

EoFauna posted another Teaser on there Facebook Page.

All i can say is that THERE IS NO DENYING that it is a Atlasaurus. (Or a very tall sauropod at the very least)

[Ravonium]

I think Takama's post has summed up my opinion on this image better than I could 

[Shonisaurus]

Hurray is an atlasaurus I am almost certain.

[Jose S.M.]

Almost sure is the Atlasaurus, which would be a great addition to any collection. Obscure sauropods are rarely made and the company that took that risk more often was collecta, but on their not very good years. Safari did very good with their Malawisaurus and now this new Eofauna figure will be great I'm sure

[Dinoreplicas]

Teasing us with a flash of leg

[Bokisaurus]

Yup, Atlasaurus for sure
And based on just that little slice, the details looks amazing!
I just hope it's a good size one.

[Jose S.M.]

They said their sauropods are going to be at 1:40 scale and I think Atlasaurus is estimated to have been 15 meters in length so that put it in a similar size than Safari's Camarasaurus. Their proportions might be different but at least that gives an idea I think.

[Gothmog the Baryonyx]

I'll admit that I mistook the original slither to be from a Proboscidean, but today's image all but confirms that it is indeed the Atlasaurus. That will make a fine addition to my collection...

[suspsy]

 Even if it was a really cool one like Stegotetrabelodon or Platybelodon, a third probosidean still would have been kind of a letdown.

[Lanthanotus]

Altasaurus, ... it looks very much like that picture from the "how it works" magazine..... fine, another must have and the first weirdo sauropod by Eofauna

[tanystropheus]

Even if it was a really cool one like Stegotetrabelodon or Platybelodon, a third probosidean still would have been kind of a letdown.

I don't think it would be a letdown at all. I actually am looking forward to Eofauna continuing their prehistoric elephant line.

[tanystropheus]

I'll admit that I mistook the original slither to be from a Proboscidean, but today's image all but confirms that it is indeed the Atlasaurus. That will make a fine addition to my collection...

It's a green Proboscidean 

[Renecito]

I think it's a Sauropod, and I am loving the colours!.

[The Prehistoric Traveler]

Even if it was a really cool one like Stegotetrabelodon or Platybelodon, a third probosidean still would have been kind of a letdown.

I don't think it would be a letdown at all. I actually am looking forward to Eofauna continuing their prehistoric elephant line.

Agreed. I hope the second one will be a proboscidean but i think it will be a triceratops.

[Shonisaurus]

It may be the second Eofauna dinosaur (third if we consider giganotosaurus) a triceratops but we sincerely have many triceratops in the market, a medusaceratops or a kosmoceratops or other triceratops-like ceraptosides and less commercialized and represented in the collecting market and in The toy market such as chasmosaurus, arrhinoceratops, diceratops, anchiceratops or torosaurus would be good bets for the Eofauna brand. They are obscure ceraptosides in the market and what is better they do not "differ" much in their appearance to triceratops. It could be a better idea.

Although a scientific triceratops by Eofauna would not upset me either.

[Concavenator]

I think it's safe to assume that it is indeed going to be an Atlasaurus.

As for the second figure, my bet is Triceratops.