Review and photographs by Funk, edited by Suspsy
UKRD released a series of dinosaur toys in the early 1990s’, and I remember my kindergarten class had dozens of them. They came in at least three size classes, with the medium ones being most prevalent. Many of them seem to have been modelled after John Sibbick’s artwork in David Norman’s classic 1985 Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Dinosaurs, though with different colour schemes (clear examples of this are the Allosaurus, Parasaurolophus, and Iguanodon). This is also true for the subject of this review, though with some caveats regarding its identity that will be discussed below (beware, it will be as complicated as modern ankylosaur taxonomy is).
What we have here is a figure labelled as Ankylosaurus on its belly, a famous genus known from surprisingly incomplete fossil material, but this is clearly not what the toy depicts. Instead, it almost perfectly matches Sibbick’s illustration of the related ankylosaur Euoplocephalus in shape and pose, while differing by its entirely orange colouration. Even disregarding Sibbick’s art, we can identify it as Euoplocephalus based on the two spikey osteoderms above the shoulders, the very wide tail knob, and the fact that its nostrils face forwards rather than to the sides, which is unique for Ankylosaurus. Why UKRD did not label it as Euoplocephalus may be due to it also being an ankylosaur (a member of the family Ankylosauridae and the suborder Ankylosauria), and lay persons have often confused common terms for dinosaur families with the genera these are named after (a recent case is the “Nodosaurus” in the game Jurassic World Alive that is clearly based on Borealopelta, which was referred widely as just a “nodosaur” in the media before it was formally named).
However, ankylosaur taxonomy has been in a state of flux in recent years, so I would argue we cannot even call it Euoplocephalus anymore. The specimen with the shoulder spikes that is the basis for this feature being depicted on Euoplocephalus is the one at the Natural History Museum in London (NHMUK R5161), which is itself what the genus Scolosaurus is based on. This specimen has some of the best preserved ankylosaur armour known for many years, as the osteoderms were in their life position on the skin, and not scattered all around. Now, Scolosaurus was long considered a junior synonym of Euoplocephalus (since 1971) until it was revived in 2013. So can we conclude that the figure is a Scolosaurus then? Not so fast . . .
It just so happens that the tail on Sibbick’s image, and thus on the figure, is also based on a very distinct specimen which was also assigned to Euoplocephalus: a broad tail club consisting of two large, distinctly shaped osteoderms with two smaller ones poking out at the tip. As part of the same taxonomic flux mentioned above, this tail club (specimen AMNH 5245) has since been reassigned to Anodontosaurus, another genus which was recently considered a synonym of Euoplocephalus. What the skull is based on is uncertain; the head in Sibbick’s image and the toy is similar to a tall, domed skull which is depicted diagrammatically in the book, as well as in some skeletal reconstructions of Euoplocephalus by Gregory S. Paul which combine it with the body of Scolosaurus. This skull (AMNH 5405) has been assigned to either genus by different authors in recent years. So what we have here is, like most, if not all, other Euoplocephalus depictions in existence, a chimera of a Scolosaurus body, an Anodontosaurus tail club, and, depending on who you ask, the skull of Euoplocephalus itself. Add to this that the figure is labelled as Ankylosaurus, and we are left with a quadrupled chimera.
Okay, with all this out of the way, let’s go on with describing the figure. It is about 14 cm long, and disregarding the taxonomic issues above, it is a fairly decent rendition of what Euoplocephalus was thought to have looked like in the 80s’ and 90s.’ The armour on the body is a decent match to the London Scolosaurus specimen, as is the tail club to the AMNH specimen, though the large osteoderms seem a bit too round. Unlike many other of his dinosaurs in the book, Sibbick’s ankylosaurs do not drag their tails along the ground, which also gives this figure a more modern look than the other UKRD dinosaurs, most of which drag their tails (even the Velociraptor). Similar to Sibbick’s depiction, the figure is in mid-stride, with a wide open mouth, and the tail curving towards its left.
The colour scheme is a rather surprising orange (compared to the dull colours ankylosaurs are often depicted with), which seems to be the colour of the soft plastic it has been cast in. The armour on the back is painted in a slightly darker orange, the tongue is red, and the eyes are white with black pupils. But the paint here is applied rather sloppily; as with many such figures, this one has much smaller eyes than what the paint splotches would indicate, which always looks awful.
While previous UKRD reviews have dismissed the figures as being ugly, I think this and a few of the other ones have some charm in seemingly being based on some nice 1980s’ paleoart. This one in particular is pretty dynamic and detailed for an ankylosaur toy of that era (this one has 1992 stamped on its belly), and the UKRD toys undoubtedly have nostalgic value for a lot of people who were kids at the time. So many of these were produced that I doubt they’ll be hard to find or particularly expensive for anyone looking for them.
Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon on the DinoToyBlog are affiliate links, so we make a small commission if you use them. Thanks for supporting us!