Ah, the Invicta dinosaurs – every one a retro-tastic delight, and every one now sadly out of production (and replaced at the Natural History Museum (London) by a piece of Toyway tat not worthy of the museum’s seal of approval…BAH). Triceratops here is one of the earlier figures in the line, and it shows – which is not to say that it isn’t a delightful figure, like the majority of Invictasaurs.
First manufactured in 1975, this figure predictably portrays a very reptilian, sluggish-looking animal. Much like the mounted cast in the Natural History Museum itself, it seems almost as if the sculptor has contrived to make the short tail of Triceratops reach the ground in order to be dragging – as if the animal’s obeying instructions from mid-20th century palaeontologists. Its perma-grumpy face would certainly suggest that it isn’t too happy about the situation. In addition it has a highly suspect (ie. historic) posture and the head appears to be a little undersized. The underside of the creature reads “TRICERATOPS, length about 5m” – rather on the small side for a Triceratops. 1:45 scale is about right for an animal of this length, but for an adult Triceratops this is, at 14cm long, more like 1:60.
Still, it’s very easy to be critical from the viewpoint of, er, the future. In spite of its flaws from a modern perspective (and even an historical one, given the scale), this figure is a delight. Given its year of manufacture the amount of detail lavished upon this toy is astonishing. The head is very finely detailed, with nostrils, ears, and eyes with eyelids and tiny pupils. In fact, it puts many modern dinosaur toys to shame (please disregard the scuffing on my example). Elsewhere, the body is covered with pebbly scales that give way to almost crocodilian armour on the animal’s back – recent finds hint that this may not be all that speculative. It marks this Triceratops out from its generic, rhinoceros-skinned peers.
I’m aware that the majority of readers of this blog will probably be avid Invicta dinosaur hunters already (and some of you have complete sets – you swines), but if you’re not then this figure is a perfect example of why you, the discerning dinosaur toy collector, should be. In their time these were unsurpassed, and even now they remain quite beautiful, even if only as museum pieces. Their statuesque nature makes them bad as toys, but great for collectors, and this Triceratops is among the finest in the collection.
As far as acquiring one goes, I’m quite sure you already know what I’m going to say – it’s off to eBay! They aren’t too rare (Triceratops is a popular genus after all), and sometimes you can pick them up in bulk lots. Sadly, the days when you could get them in museum gift shops are long gone. It’s well worth keeping a beady eye out for.
P.S. This ‘Triceratops special’ is pure coincidence, but I quite like how it turned out! 😉
Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon on the DinoToyBlog are affiliate links, so we make a small commission if you use them. Thanks for supporting us!
yes museum availability long gone which,s where i got mine in the 70s…triceratops was and is still me fave today plus as a kid smaller equally nice replicas were sold in our local toy shop but as to their maker i have no idea. No doubt i may purchase the trike and maybe T-rex from evilbuy at some point.
This Triceratops looks like it could have walked off a film set by Willis O’Brien or Ray Harryhausen, and that’s why I like it; the details are so intense one can’t help thinking the figure could come to life. Looking from when we are now, with modern lines striving for accuracy, aping the Jurassic Park franchise, or just getting stuck in outdated ideas, the Invicta still stands as a respectable model/toy that proudly represents the science of its time (even if that was just starting to change).
The Harryhausen look is more than coincidental. The sculptor for the early Invicta toys is Arthur Haywood. The very same guy who designed and modelled all the stop-motion dinosaurs in One Million Years BC and Valley of Gwangi.
Is the frill actually fused to the back? I know there was a weird theory at the time the figure was produced, which proposed ceratopsian’s frills attached to the back muscles…
http://chasmosaurs.blogspot.com.es/2012/05/vintage-dinosaur-art-evolution-and.html
The figure could be made thinking on this… or not… But it’s interesting since it’s from that date, and no other trike figure seems to present this
I reckon the lacking of the famous cheekbone on the head is worth mentioning. Instead, the sculptor seemed to put a sort of “bony” protuberance, maybe just an ovoid osteoderm? Quite a strange detail, in times where the triceratops skull was quite well known already.
That strange “ovoid” decoration was invented way way back to 1901 by the man Charles Knight himself. Watch it:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4d/Knight_Triceratops.jpg
Meanwhile that croc back was absence on Knight’s little horned lizard, but quite common in the trike made by his unnoficial son, Zdeneck Burian, which on the other hand had the cheekbone.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-merQFV-hQ6Q/UBbJJEALJEI/AAAAAAAABDk/RaWsPzoHuJk/s1600/Triceratops.jpg
So I reckon you can say Invicta’s triceratops is the son of both Knight and Burian.
I know what you are thinking. But no. I’m not at all trying to suggest these two good men had any kind of romantic affair. I was being methaphorical. You know what that means, do you, punks?
They sold the Invicta dinosaurs until a few years ago in the museum of natural history in Stuttgart (Germany) – I was quite glad to see that because I still like them better than many “modern” figures with comic-ish proportions. It’s great how “adult” Invicta’s models look, and, of course, there’s a huge load of nostalgia 🙂
[…] The best aspect of this sculpt is the skin detail, which as with many other Invictas (including the Triceratops) is very impressive for a model of this age. There is a complete coverage of scales, with larger, […]
A great model indeed! To all the people who keep rating it down…I know where you live. 😉
A great model that deserves a review. Long overdue…1975 man! I used to envy all the kids who had one. Plus I grew up in Leicester the home of Invicta so I have a special connection to them.