We now return to our series of pliosaur reviews. We have already looked in detail at the popular Chap Mei Liopleurodon here and more recently the Kronosaurus by Schleich. Let’s now take a look at Safari Ltd’s offering, another popular figure, the Carnegie Collection Kronosaurus.
Once again, we’re not in a very good state of affairs as there are far more problems with the sculpt than there are commendations. However, Safari can be forgiven for some of the errors since their figure is clearly based on a famous mounted skeleton now known to be inaccurate, as I will discuss later. But first, let’s take the figure at face value. The main body is a perfectly cylindrical tube, more like a miserable fat sausage than a pliosaur body. The distance between the fore and hind flippers is far too long. The body is also made of a harder plastic than the head: the two materials are quite crudely joined together just in front of the fore flipper, where the join is visible.
The head is widely gaping and quite fearsome looking. The nostrils are accurately retracted close to the eyes, and nicely sculpted as narrow slits as in the Schleich Kronosaurus, but the eyes are way too far back, situated in the temporal fenestrae. This figure is unusual for plesiosaur figures as it’s the only one with ears – at the back of the skull there are two small distinct external openings. Whether such a feature would be present in derived aquatic reptiles is unclear. Where the lower jaws meet the upper jaws the cheek extends very far back, but this region would have been more muscular in life.
The dentition suffers from some of the same problems as the Schleich figure. The teeth are all equally sized whereas there should be a lot of variation. Worse, there is an inexplicable gap in the dentition at the very front of the jaws, as if some teeth have fallen out, so the tooth rows do not meet up at the front and form a separated rows in each of the jaws, and the snout extends beyond the teeth… all very un-pliosaur-like. The shape of the lower jaw is very nice, though, it is narrow and triangular but expands near the tip forming a spatulate symphysis, a character typical of pliosaurs. Again, there are some pleasing speculative additions to the mouth: a gullet and a big bulbous tongue are visible.
The spine is perfectly straight, and this figure has a distinct neck, two improvements over the Schleich version. The flippers are incredibly weedy, they look like they could get ripped off in choppy waters. The hind flippers are tiny and impossibly oriented backwards. The hind-flippers in pliosaurs are actually larger than the fore-flippers, and all four limbs had an active role in propulsion. The limbs are possibly the worst and most inaccurate aspect of this figure. In my version the limbs are all horizontal, but in other versions the forelimbs are angled down proppping the animal up a bit. As in the Schleich Kronosaurus, the flippers are too thin where they meet the body, there’s hardly enough depth for the head of the humerus/femur bones, let alone the strong muscles that powered the flippers. The tail tapers to a narrow tip and is just about the right size.
The colour scheme is grey and light grey, the underside is counter-shaded with a pale grey. The eyes are black, lacking pupils. The figure is 33cm long making it the longest pliosaur replica currently available. It is quite a stunning figure, but there are far too many mistakes for it to be greatly admired.
I mentioned near the start of my review that Safari might be forgiven for some of their errors, perhaps they have an excuse? Well in some sense they do because their reconstruction clearly stems from the most famous skeletal mount of Kronosaurus, the ‘Harvard Specimen’ on display in the Museum of Comparative Anatomy at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. To cut a long story short, the specimen was badly damaged and much of it had to be reconstructed in plaster, earning the mounted skeleton the nickname of ‘Plasterosaurus’. The number of vertebrae has been overestimated with ten or so vertebrae too many in the backbone, so at least Safari have a reason for their long-bodied sausage-saurus Kronosaurus toy.
In my next pliosaur review we will meet the Walking With Dinosaurs Liopleurodon!
Disclaimer: links to Ebay and Amazon on the DinoToyBlog are affiliate links, so we make a small commission if you use them. Thanks for supporting us!
[…] but they are correctly positioned in the orbits; thankfully complaints about plesiosaur eyes being placed in entirely the wrong opening are over these days. The eyes face forwards to some degree showing that pliosaurs had binocular […]
I’ve been on your blog for about three minutes, and you’ve already officially sold me on it.
Ha! Expect me to visit ALOT. 😀
Spencer
Ok,i’ll tell it straight…I consider this to be the best Kronosaurus toy ever made,superior to the already good Schleich one.
Even with all the innacuracies,this is a badass figure,no doubt about that 😉
Oh,and the fore-fins in the figure i own are almost perfectly vertical!
That bending of the flippers is caused by the weight of the sculpt pushing down over time…mine did it and I had use a hair-dryer to fix them..I also made a custom stand out of some coral to hold him up off of them after that..but eventually just hung it from the ceiling. Both ways will keep them from bending outward and gives it more of a gliding pose I think.
Just to clarify, there are two versions of this figure. The first one had flippers that were sticking out to the side flat. That was the one I bought back in the mid 90s, and it came that way. Later versions had vertical fins. They did the same thing with Elasmosaurus.