Plesiosaurus (version 2) (Soft Model by Favorite Co. Ltd)

3.8 (6 votes)

Nope, you’re not seeing double. Ever since Favorite released their second wave of ‘Soft Models’, their line is starting to resemble an alternative retelling of the Noah’s Ark fable, in which the dinosaurs march along two by two. That’s because they decided, instead of creating new species, to redo and update their existing species list.

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison
Compare and contrast. Favorite Co. Ltd Plesiosaurus version 2 top, version 1 bottom.

After delaying my review of the original version 1 Plesiosaurus for far too long, my bad habits have diminished very little. This new version, essentially a replacement for the previous version, has been on my ‘to review’ list ever since I received it as a generous gift from dinotoyforum regular and all-round top bloke, Postsaurischian, back when the figure first became available a few years ago. For two representatives of exactly the same genus there are a lot of differences to note between this pair, which make the review ripe for a bout of ‘compare and contrast’.

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison

I’ll start with the proportions. It’s obvious at first glance that this new figure is more stocky than its predecessor, with a shorter neck, and broader shorter flippers. But let’s quantify this. To determine which figure is closer to reality I decided to take some measurements and here’s what I found. The neck of version 1 is 46% of the entire length of the animal, almost half, while version two is only 33%, a third. Based on measurement of the holotype specimen of Plesiosaurus I calculated that the creature’s neck is %41 of the total length of the animal. So, the version 1 figure is too long by 5%, while the version 2 has under-compensated in the opposite direction by 8%. Version 1 wins the battle of accuracy by a slim 2% margin, but it is not a spectacular victory, and neither figure is apparently correct.

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison

In my review of the version 1 figure I praised the head because it was obviously based on reconstructions from the literature (e.g. this one by Storrs, 1997). The head of the second version has no glaring anatomical errors, but isn’t as detailed and doesn’t match the skull reconstructions of Plesiosaurus quite so closely. The vacuum-packed appearance gives it a bug-eyed look and the post-temporal fenestrae are too sunken. The number of teeth has been correctly increased, but they aren’t well defined. The head is therefore a step down from the original figure.

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison
Kissy, kissy! Favorite Co. Ltd Plesiosaurus version 1 on the left, version 2 on the right.

The distance between the front and hind limbs (the torso) has been increased in the new figure. This is an improvement because this region was too short in the first version which gives it a mildly ungainly appearance. This new version is more balanced in this regard. The hind limbs in the new version are pointed backwards more, and the left hind flipper is notably curved along its length, as if resisting water during the upstroke. This works well.

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison
Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison

There’s nothing too exciting about the colour, which is grey all over and not particularly photogenic. The texture is similar to the version 1 model, with strong wrinkles – I’d expect the living creature to be smoother and more streamlined. A fold of skin on the flank of the body in version 1 figure is absent in the new version, and I prefer the updated version. This figure comes with a nice little stand that consists of a blue section of sea floor, which holds a transparent rod that fits into a hole in the belly of the beast. It displays really well. The previous version had a display stand that had to be bought separately.

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison

There are some points of similarity. Both figures have a strongly arched back. My research is showing that the spine in plesiosaurs was actually rather straight, so the curvature in this model is probably too pronounced, but that’s through no fault of the sculptor – this is an active field of research. The overall posture is also similar in the two figures, with the forelimbs raised higher than the hind limbs.

Plesiosaurs Favorite comparison

The relatively shorter neck and broader flippers in version 2, and the shape of the skull, are all closer to Cryptoclidus than Plesiosaurus, so I wonder if the sculptor  made a booboo and based this updated restoration on the former genus instead. Overall, this is a really nice plesiosaur model, although not a huge  improvement over the earlier incarnation. Certainly a keeper for the marine reptile enthusiasts.

Available new from here and the whole new Favorite Soft Model set is available from here.

Support the Dinosaur Toy Blog by making dino-purchases through these links to Ebay and Amazon. Disclaimer: links to and on the The Dinosaur Toy Blog are often affiliate links, when you make purchases through these links we may make a commission

Share this:

Comments 6

  • Thanks for the informative review, plesiosauria!

    I think it would’ve been better if the stand allowed the figure to rest on it, rather than making a hole in the figure for it to go through. I don’t like the wrinkly skin on both versions of the Favorite Plesiosaurus. Smoother skin seems much more likely, and would look better too!

    I’m still surprised the second series of Favorite soft models isn’t an improvement over the first. This Plesiosaurus is a good example – it’s better than the original in some ways, but worse in others. And both have the horrible wrinkles!

  • Yay! I’ve been waiting for this review for quite a while. Excellent!!

  • The version one gets a 4.5 rating on the blog, this new version gets a 3 (so far). Is it really such a big step back?

  • Fantastic review. I bought version 2 when it became available and love the way it actually looks like it’s swimming on its stand.

    I also like your catch of the smooth skin to lessen drag. I can’t think of a single large living aquatic animal with wrinkles.

    I also question whether the fenestrae would be visible on any creature, (unless functioning as an ear drum or some other sensory apparatus) even though it is currently “fashionable” for model makers to display them through the skin.


  • Wow, now that’s a review! Man, to really know what you’re talking about makes so much difference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Search

  • Brand

  • Dinosaur Name

  • Classification

  • Age

  • Product Type

  • News Categories

  • Video Playlists

error: Content is protected !!